<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ligatures:none;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">I sent the plan for the gateways and nameservers a while ago. These systems have all been deployed and are either in the process of being cut-over to or being tested and configured. This brings all gateways and namservers up to RHEL 9
and solves the limit network space problem by the creation of a new network. We run the old systems in parallel for a while but then recycle them. Looking forward, here are the new nameservers and gateways.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Gateways:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">========<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagw9 # Gateway for ACC Users<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwhla9 # Hall A Gateway to OPS<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwhlb9 # Hall B Gateway to OPS<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwhlc9 # Hall C Gateway to OPS<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwhld9 # Hall D Gateway to OPS<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwlcls9 # Gateway for LCLS<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwops9 # OPS Gateway to HALLS<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwrad9 # Gateway for RadCon<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwsite9 # Gateway for Facilities/Site Signals<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwspare9 # Gateway for Testing<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwts9 # Gateway for Test Stands<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Nameservers:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">===========<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">devns9 # CA Nameserver for DEV<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">opsns9 # CA Nameserver<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> Anthony Cuffe <br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, January 25, 2023 4:12 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> ace@jlab.org; Weiwei Lu <weiwei@jlab.org><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Channel Access Gateway and Nameserver Plans<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I wanted to clue people into a plan Brad, Brian and I have been working on to migrate/update the Channel Access Servers to RHEL 9. The previous setup has worked very well except the network size as always a problem. We decided that we
would create a new dedicated network to host both the gateways and nameservers. We can then deploy copies of all the systems as RHEL 9 nodes and perform the migration piecemeal or however we wish. Parallel production will provide the maximum flexibility.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">This is the new Channel Access Network<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">--------------------------------------------------------------------<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> netname => canet <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> netnumber => 129.57.235.0 <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> gateway => 129.57.235.1 <o:p>
</o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> mask => 255.255.255.0 <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> cidr => 24 <o:p>
</o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> hexmask => 0Xffffff00 <o:p>
</o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> broadcast => 129.57.235.255 <o:p>
</o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> domain => acc.jlab.org <o:p>
</o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> vlan => 235 <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> comment => Channel Access Network <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">--------------------------------------------------------------------<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Here are the old vs new IPs. These were kept as the same last addresses for ease of transition. cagwspare was renamed for it’s function (it is a second hall D gateway) and given a new IP. So, for example, cagw and cagw9 will run in parallel
production until everything has been converted to look at cagw9. We would then decommission cagw and make cagw a DNS alias for cagw9.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagw 129.57.255.4
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagw9 129.57.235.4
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwhla 129.57.255.11
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwhla9 129.57.235.11
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwhlb 129.57.255.12 <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwhlb9 129.57.235.12
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwhlc 129.57.255.13
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwhlc9 129.57.235.13
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwhld 129.57.255.14
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwhld9 129.57.235.14
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwspare 129.57.255.2<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwhld91 129.57.235.15
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwlcls 129.57.255.8
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwlcls9 129.57.235.8
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwops 129.57.255.10
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwops9 129.57.235.10
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwrad 129.57.255.9
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwrad9 129.57.235.9
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwsite 129.57.255.6
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwsite9 129.57.235.6
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwts 129.57.255.5
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">cagwts9 129.57.235.5<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">opsns 129.57.255.21
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">opsns9 129.57.235.21<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">devns 129.57.255.22
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">devns9 129.57.235.22<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I hope this is clear. Let me know if you have any questions.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>