[acs] RHEL6 v RHEL9 build
Gary Croke
gcroke at jlab.org
Fri Jul 12 16:43:03 EDT 2024
Hi All,
Sending to the group as this is something I think everyone should at least be aware of. See my comment on this log entry:
SCAM-II (CEBAF) controls behave oddly | Jefferson Lab Electronic Logbook (jlab.org)<https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/4312306#comment-49996>
After we rebuilt the software for iocin1, the SCAM (beam mode selection) application stopped working correctly. I should have noticed at the time, but didn't. As I stated in the log comment, the libraries produced from RHEL6 & RHEL9 are different. I'll continue investigating. Hopefully this is limited to this application, but I guess we have no guarantee of that. If you suddenly find yourself dealing with applications behaving strangely, keep this in mind.
For those interested in the details, I copied the libraries produced, symbol tables and build output here:
/a/devuser/gcroke/scratch/libgunp.rhel9.a
/a/devuser/gcroke/scratch/libgunp.rhel6.a
/a/devuser/gcroke/scratch/libgunp.rhel9.nm
/a/devuser/gcroke/scratch/libgunp.rhel6.nm
/a/devuser/gcroke/scratch/libgunp.rhel9.txt
/a/devuser/gcroke/scratch/libgunp.rhel6.txt
On closer inspection I noticed an extra build warning reported on RHEL9:
"Large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type"
I'll let you know if I make any progress.
Gary
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/acs/attachments/20240712/b0fa5441/attachment.html>
More information about the acs
mailing list