[b1_ana] b1 phone meeting April 29 (note time)

[Dustin Keller]

You can only benefit from the systematic reduction if you us Azz as
discussed yesterday.  But at this point I am not partial.

dustin

On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, O. A. Rondon wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Since I couldn't stay until the end of the meeting, and I don't think
> there will be minutes of it, I would like to share some ideas for the
> proposal draft.
>
> Basically, what we need is an equation with the measured quantity on one
> side and b1 or Azz on the other. Based on what I think the consensus
> was, to measure polarized minus unpolarized counts on a single cup with
> the target field aligned along the beam, I've updated the draft of my
> method, see subsection 0.2, which discusses this. Eq. (19) or eq. (20)
> meet the conditions stated above. This is the approach I would subscribe
> to, unless there is another version that is shown to also represent the
> procedure, which should be circulated as soon as possible. The draft is here
> http://twist.phys.virginia.edu/~or/b1/b1_method-v2.pdf
>
> Cheers,
>
> Oscar
>
> _______________________________________________
> b1_ana mailing list
> b1_ana at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/b1_ana
>