[b1_ana] TAC/iTAC resp.

[O. A. Rondon]

Hi Ellie,

I think the weights should be the sqrt of the numbers of events, unless
you mean the sum [drift(x_i)*stat_error(x_i)]^2, so stat_error(x_i)^2 =
N_event(x_i).

Cheers,

Oscar

Elena Long wrote:
> Good evening,
> 
> Using the drift uncertainties that Dustin lists in Table 1 of his 
> response, I recalculated the plots for both the individual spectrometer 
> settings and the x-rebinned plots. They can be found at 
> https://hallcweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/Elong-13-06-03
> 
> For the x-rebinned plots, the drifts were taken as a weighted average 
> that was weighted by the number of events that each spectrometer 
> setting contributed to a particular x bin.
> 
> Take care,
> Ellie
> 
> Elena Long, Ph.D.
> Post Doctoral Research Associate
> University of New Hampshire
> elena.long at unh.edu
> ellie at jlab.org
> http://nuclear.unh.edu/~elong
> (603) 862-1962
> 
> On Mon 03 Jun 2013 02:40:21 PM EDT, Dustin Keller wrote:
>> The working rough draft of the TAC/iTAC response is at
>> https://userweb.jlab.org/~dustin/work/b1_dir/Azz_response/
>>
>> we may need considerable altering, editing, and condensing
>> but all the information is there.
>>
>> dustin
>> _______________________________________________
>> b1_ana mailing list
>> b1_ana at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/b1_ana
> _______________________________________________
> b1_ana mailing list
> b1_ana at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/b1_ana
>