[b1_ana] TAC/iTAC resp.

[Dustin Keller]

Yes I'm ok with using as much or as little as we all decide
I guess we can determine what to keep next meeting.

dustin

On Wed, 5 Jun 2013, O. A. Rondon wrote:

> Hi Dustin,
>
> Minor comment: collaboration spelling.
>
> One comment Don made is that a 7-8 pages response to a two pages report
> seems a bit too long. I tend to agree that we should do some condensing.
>
> Also I think the bulk of section 3 would be better separated as an
> addendum. I think at the response level we should concentrate on
> justifying 20% Pzz. I believe Karl said that Chris was comfortable with it.
>
> One way to attain the desired level would be to use a 6.5 T coil (simple
> solenoid is cheapest, and it would work fine with longitudinal field). I
> do think we should mention that a new target should be seriously
> considered, since the CLAS coils were just a stopgap solution for an
> experiment that needed both para and perp field.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Oscar
>
>
>
>
> Dustin Keller wrote:
>> Edits have been made to the TAC/iTAC resp. with the
>> updated version at
>> https://userweb.jlab.org/~dustin/work/b1_dir/Azz_response/
>>
>> additional edits and suggestions are welcome.
>>
>> dustin
>>
>> On Mon, 3 Jun 2013, Dustin Keller wrote:
>>
>>> The working rough draft of the TAC/iTAC response is at
>>> https://userweb.jlab.org/~dustin/work/b1_dir/Azz_response/
>>>
>>> we may need considerable altering, editing, and condensing
>>> but all the information is there.
>>>
>>> dustin
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> b1_ana mailing list
>>> b1_ana at jlab.org
>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/b1_ana
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> b1_ana mailing list
>> b1_ana at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/b1_ana
>>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> b1_ana mailing list
> b1_ana at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/b1_ana
>