[b1_ana] Awaiting approval

[Elena Long]

"The time for each cycle for x = 0.15 are actually half as long so the 
value of δAdzz would ultimately be significantly smaller than the 
estimate in the table."

Is it possible to get the updated number so that we don't need this 
qualifier?

Take care,
Ellie

Elena Long, Ph.D.
Post Doctoral Research Associate
University of New Hampshire
elena.long at unh.edu
ellie at jlab.org
http://nuclear.unh.edu/~elong
(603) 862-1962

On Mon 10 Jun 2013 01:29:08 PM EDT, Dustin Keller wrote:
> We would like to send the note along with the e-mail responses so if
> everyone can take the time to look through the content and numbers
> discussed in the note and give either an OK or specific suggestions
> by the end of the day then we can respond by tomorrow.  Karl will polish
> it up and make the finishing edits but if there are any changes to numbers
> or content now is the time to let me know.
>
> Plots will be updated soon
>
> Thanks
> dustin
> _______________________________________________
> b1_ana mailing list
> b1_ana at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/b1_ana