[b1_ana] b1d

[Karl Slifer]

From: "O. A. Rondon" <or at virginia.edu>
To: Simonetta Liuti <sl4y at virginia.edu>, kk7t at virginia.edu, b1 at jlab.org
Cc: Karl Slifer <karl.slifer at unh.edu>, Donal Day
<dbd at cms.mail.virginia.edu>, Patricia Solvignon <solvigno at jlab.org>, Narbe
Kalantarians <narbe at jlab.org>, "J.P. Chen" <jpchen at jlab.org>,
ellie at jlab.org, "Donald G. Crabb" <dgc3q at cms.mail.virginia.edu>, Dustin
Keller <dustin at jlab.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:33:06 -0400
Subject: b1d

Dear Simonetta and Kunal,

It was great to meet with you two and Dustin today, to discuss how to
measure b1. Here are some items that you should find useful.

b1 wiki
https://hallcweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/B1

The talk slides I showed at the meeting are under "Relevant Publications"

The email attachment from Bob Jaffe replying to our question about sec.
6 of his paper with Hoodbhoy and Manohar is on my b1 folder on twist
https://twist.phys.virginia.edu/~or/b1/

look for "b1-b2.pdf", but feel free to explore any and all items there.
Our question, as formulated by Patricia, and Jaffe's reply are at the
end of this message.

There is a b1 mailing list that you can subscribe to, see the wiki. I'm
copying this message to the mailing list. All interested collaborators
should subscribe, and future mailings be done preferably using the list.

Thank you and looking forward to our collaboration on this project,

Oscar

> --------------
> On Nov 30, 2010, at 5:16 PM, Robert L. Jaffe wrote:
>
>> Dear Patricia,
>>
>> Attached is a .tex/.pdf file that addresses your question.  There
> certainly is a difference between a state polarized transverse to the
> beam and one polarized longitudinal to it.  I hope the notes are useful.
>> Bob
>> <b1-b2.pdf>
>> Robert L. Jaffe
>> Morningstar Professor of Physics and MacVicar Faculty Fellow
>
>
>> On Nov 30, 2010, at 12:47 PM, Patricia SOLVIGNON wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Bob.
>>>
>>> Because I have been used to think in the case of spin-1/2 and the
> double-polarization
>>> measurement, I am still a bit confused about the right measurement
> method of b1. From
>>> section 6 of your paper with P. Hoodbhoy and A. Manohar (Nuc. Phys
> B312, 571(1989)),
>>> the variable H appears in both sigma_para and sigma_perp.
>>> My understanding is that H (= the target spin projection along the
> beam) is equal to +/-1
>>> in the longitudinal case and to 0 in the transverse case. If that is
> true:
>>> sigma_para  = sigma_perp = kin_fact *sigma_mott*(F1 - 1/3 b1)
>>>
>>> and we need either to perform a measurement of F1d from an
> unpolarized target at the
>>> same kinematics as for the measurement on the longitudinally
> polarized target or use a
>>> model from F1d with the uncertainty that comes along.
>>>
>>> The submission of the proposal is due tomorrow so I want to make sure
> I understood the
>>> formalism for a measurement of b1.
>>>
>>> Thank you for your help.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Patricia










---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: b1-request at jlab.org
To:
Cc:
Date:
Subject: confirm 94e2fe0a0dd926e0b4209c026f4eca72e653dc1e
If you reply to this message, keeping the Subject: header intact,
Mailman will discard the held message.  Do this if the message is
spam.  If you reply to this message and include an Approved: header
with the list password in it, the message will be approved for posting
to the list.  The Approved: header can also appear in the first line
of the body of the reply.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/b1_ana/attachments/20130315/c735f141/attachment.html