[b1_ana] draft V05

[Jian-ping Chen]

Hi, Karl,

I agree with Oscar that the error due to drift should be divided by 
number of pairs.
2nd paragraph after eq(30) on page 26,
" All of these types of variation as can be realized both during the 
experiment though
monitoring as well as..."
--> "All of these types of variation can be controlled and minimized 
during the experiment
through carefully monitoring as well as..."

Cheers.

Jian-ping

On 5/5/2013 11:44 PM, Oscar Rondon-Aramayo wrote:
> Hi Karl,
>
> Just above eq. 29, "from g2p/gep exp." need to  change delta epsilon to
> delta Q.
>
> After eq. (30), if the 3.7E-3 drift error per cycle is averaged over 10
> cycles, it would be reduced by 1/sqrt(10), to 1E-3. I would mention this,
> instead of shortening the cycle period, which increases the overhead.
>
> For the run plan, we should do a cycle period optimization, based on
> overhead vs number of cycles.
>
> It looks good.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Oscar
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, 5 May 2013 23:08:56 -0400
>    Karl Slifer <karl.slifer at unh.edu> wrote:
>> Attached please find the latest draft.  Thanks Dustin for the latest
>> updates to the systematic discussion.  If anyone is still up, please run
>> some fresh eyes over section 2.
> _______________________________________________
> b1_ana mailing list
> b1_ana at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/b1_ana