Sort of. They only did it with ND3.<br><br>Narbe<br><br>Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone<br><br><div id="htc_header" style="">----- Reply message -----<br>From: "Karl Slifer" <karl.slifer@unh.edu><br>To: <br>Cc: "b1_ana@jlab.org" <b1_ana@jlab.org><br>Subject: [b1_ana] LiD<br>Date: Thu, May 2, 2013 2:02 pm<br><br></div><br><div dir="ltr"><br><div>I thought that it got absorbed into eg1-dvcs?</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div><div><div>---<br><div>Karl J. Slifer<div>Assistant Professor</div><div>University of New Hampshire<br>
<div>Telephone : <a>603-722-0695</a></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:57 PM, <<a href="mailto:narbe@jlab.org">narbe@jlab.org</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote">
<br>
Hi Karl,<br>
<br>
If you're referring to the g1d experiment, that unfortunately got killed<br>
back in 2009.<br>
<br>
Narbe<br>
<div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
> Hi all,<br>
><br>
> LiD has better dilution factor and prob better polarization, but we<br>
> decided<br>
> to not use it for last PAC. Can someone remind me why we backed away from<br>
> using it? I guess it was the ambiguity of how to treat the Li (=He+D),<br>
> but<br>
> in the mean time, I think Peter ran an experiment comparing LiD to ND3, so<br>
> we'd be on firmer ground now.<br>
><br>
> Oscar, I think you looked closely at this. Can we use LiD?<br>
><br>
> -Karl<br>
</div></div>> _______________________________________________<br>
> b1_ana mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:b1_ana@jlab.org">b1_ana@jlab.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/b1_ana">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/b1_ana</a><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>