<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Good afternoon,<br>
<br>
I've re-run the statistics using the method we decided on yesterday.
The results can be seen here:
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<a
href="https://hallcweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/Elong-13-05-01-Azz-Method-2#Plots_with_using_Azz_Method_2_Calculations">https://hallcweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/Elong-13-05-01-Azz-Method-2#Plots_with_using_Azz_Method_2_Calculations</a><br>
<br>
Please note that they have grown by a factor of two compared to the
previous assumption, where we had both positive and negative
polarization. The calculations for the new method are formalized in
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<a
href="https://hallcweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/Elong-13-05-01-Azz-Method-2#Azz_Formalism_-_Method_2">https://hallcweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/Elong-13-05-01-Azz-Method-2#Azz_Formalism_-_Method_2</a><br>
<br>
Oscar has been mentioning that the code was missing a sqrt(2), which
was true. The other sqrt(2) on top of it comes from the assumption
before equation 25, which brings the total uncertainty a factor of
two larger than was projected with the old method.<br>
<br>
Take care,<br>
Ellie<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Elena Long, Ph.D.
Post Doctoral Research Associate
University of New Hampshire
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:elena.long@unh.edu">elena.long@unh.edu</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ellie@jlab.org">ellie@jlab.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://nuclear.unh.edu/~elong">http://nuclear.unh.edu/~elong</a>
(603) 862-1962</pre>
</body>
</html>