<div dir="ltr"><br><div>Great. that looks much better. I'll change the abstract to reflect 30 days.</div><div><br></div><div>-Karl</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Long, Elena <<a href="mailto:Elena.Long@unh.edu">Elena.Long@unh.edu</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote">
Good morning,<br>
<br>
I've finished making vectors for each of the plots. They can be found here: <a href="http://nuclear.unh.edu/~elong/analysis_files/2013-05-04/">http://nuclear.unh.edu/~elong/analysis_files/2013-05-04/</a><br>
<br>
I also noticed that in the abstract we mention asking for 28 days, but the calculations I've done for rates assumed 30 days. Should we change the amount we're asking, or should I take two days away from the statistics?<br>
<br>
Take care,<br>
Ellie<br>
<br>
On May 5, 2013, at 10:19 AM, Karl Slifer <<a href="mailto:karl.slifer@unh.edu">karl.slifer@unh.edu</a>><br>
<div><div class="h5"> wrote:<br>
<br>
><br>
> Dear b1 core,<br>
><br>
> I think we are asymptotically approaching our goal of a submittable proposal, but we're not there yet. To my view, there are a few issues that still have to be addressed:<br>
><br>
><br>
> 1) The systematic discussion of Oscar and Dustin have to be merged and added to the text. Note that I'm assuming that everyone essentially agrees with their arguments, which may not be true but I havent heard otherwise. I'm working on merging this in, but will need a help from them both.<br>
><br>
> 2) We need to add a discussion of the correlation length at our various x, and perhaps how this relates to HERMES. Oscar, do you have time to summarize the work you did a few weeks ago into a paragraph or two?<br>
><br>
> 3) We need to add a short discussion of the impact of aligning Pz along the beamline and not the q-vector. Again, Oscar did the most work here, so as a "reward" I'll ask him if he has time to please summarize in a paragraph or two. This discussion can be combined with point 2) above.<br>
><br>
> 4) We need final kinematic and expected error plots. Ellie is working on making some cleaner plots, but I can use the existing ones if necessary. To be clear, the final expectations are in Ellie's email "Rates per x-bin" at 5:23pm. This is the plots we'll use unless someone objects.<br>
><br>
> 5) Should we include b1_method-v2 discussion of difference of counts as an appendix? Sorry if this was already resolved and I missed it. Oscar, what do you think?<br>
><br>
> 6) any other major issues?<br>
><br>
><br>
> -Karl<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
</div></div>> _______________________________________________<br>
> b1_ana mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:b1_ana@jlab.org">b1_ana@jlab.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/b1_ana">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/b1_ana</a><br>
<br>
--------------------------------------------<br>
Elena Long, Ph.D.<br>
Post Doctoral Research Associate<br>
University of New Hampshire<br>
<a href="mailto:elena.long@unh.edu">elena.long@unh.edu</a><br>
<a href="mailto:ellie@jlab.org">ellie@jlab.org</a><br>
<a href="tel:%28603%29%20862-1962">(603) 862-1962</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>