<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Hi All,</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">I finally had time to read the <a href="https://userweb.jlab.org/~slifer/b1/papers/1997_nikolaeva_schafer_PLB_tensor_sea.pdf">Nikolaev and Schaefer paper</a>, referred to in our theory review. One interesting piece is that the paper claims the Close-Kumano sum rule is invalidated by the divergence of b2 as x->0. Now the reference perhaps makes a little more sense (to me), since the reviewers earlier comment on whether we will make a meaningful measurement of CK. </div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">One other nice thing from the theory review is that they explicitly state "With very little experimental information currently available, any new data on b1 would be clearly welcome", which is a direct contradiction of the iTAC comment.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">-Karl</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div><div><div><br></div></div></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Karl Slifer <<a href="mailto:karl.slifer@unh.edu">karl.slifer@unh.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"><div class=""><div class="h5"><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>From: <b class="gmail_sendername">Susan Brown</b> <<a href="mailto:sbrown@jlab.org">sbrown@jlab.org</a>><br>
Date: Fri, May 17, 2013 at 3:52 PM<br>Subject: Theory Technial Advisory Report<br>To: Karl Slifer <<a href="mailto:karl.slifer@unh.edu">karl.slifer@unh.edu</a>>, Karl Slifer <<a href="mailto:slifer@jlab.org">slifer@jlab.org</a>><br>
<br><br>Attached please find a copy of the Theory Technical Advisory report for your PAC submission.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
Susan</div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>