<div dir="ltr"><br><div>Hi Dustin,</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks for the plots. If Ellie can produce a 12% slide I'll include it as backup. I suspect it will require reducing the number of x-points to 1 or 2.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Also, do you have the plot of ND3 pol versus B-field? Are the existing cavities made for 7T or 7.5T?</div><div><br></div><div>thanks,</div><div><br></div><div> Karl</div>
<div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div><div><div>---<br><div>Karl J. Slifer<div>Assistant Professor</div><div>University of New Hampshire<br><div>Telephone : <a>603-722-0695</a></div>
</div></div></div></div></div></div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Dustin Keller <<a href="mailto:dustin@jlab.org">dustin@jlab.org</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote">
Also in a side conversation with don he was<br>
highly recommending a backup slide that showed<br>
projection for 12-15% Pzz demonstrating that<br>
even with their down playing of the polarization<br>
the experiment can still work. This is true for<br>
systematics being its only a 20/15 factor increase<br>
in the drift, probably around that with statistical<br>
uncertainty increase as well.<font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
dustin</font><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On Sat, 15 Jun 2013, Dustin Keller wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">
Here is some infor for the HB/tensor pol slides<br>
<br>
<a href="https://userweb.jlab.org/~dustin/work/TargetFigs/">https://userweb.jlab.org/~<u></u>dustin/work/TargetFigs/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>