<div dir="ltr"><br><div>Hi all,</div><div><br></div><div>Here's a new draft of the slides incorporating Ellie's and Dustin's work, and addressing (hopefully) most of what we discussed on Friday. </div>
<div><br></div><div><div><a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/59933793/b1_pac40_rev1.ppt">https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/59933793/b1_pac40_rev1.ppt</a><br></div><div><a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/59933793/b1_pac40_rev1.pdf">https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/59933793/b1_pac40_rev1.pdf</a></div>
<div><br></div><div>Please take a look. Slides have to be submitted by 5:00 pm Monday.</div><div><br></div><div>I'm going to do another dry run at 11:00 am Monday. If any non-locals want to participate, let me know and I'll set up a line.</div>
<div><br></div><div>thanks,</div><div><br></div><div> Karl</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div><div><div>---<br><div>
Karl J. Slifer<div>Assistant Professor</div><div>University of New Hampshire<br><div>Telephone : <a>603-722-0695</a></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Long, Elena <<a href="mailto:Elena.Long@unh.edu">Elena.Long@unh.edu</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote">
Good evening,<br>
<br>
I haven't finished up all the changes from Friday's discussion, but I did include Dustin's slides in the same format as the rest of the talk, and began updates from Friday. Current versions can be found at <a href="http://nuclear.unh.edu/~elong/analysis_files/2013-06-16/">http://nuclear.unh.edu/~elong/analysis_files/2013-06-16/</a><br>
<br>
Take care,<br>
Ellie<br>
<br>
________________________________________<br>
From: <a href="mailto:b1_ana-bounces@jlab.org">b1_ana-bounces@jlab.org</a> [<a href="mailto:b1_ana-bounces@jlab.org">b1_ana-bounces@jlab.org</a>] on behalf of Oscar Rondon-Aramayo [<a href="mailto:or@cms.mail.virginia.edu">or@cms.mail.virginia.edu</a>]<br>
Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2013 7:46 PM<br>
To: <a href="mailto:b1_ana@jlab.org">b1_ana@jlab.org</a><br>
<div><div class="h5">Subject: Re: [b1_ana] slides<br>
<br>
The statistic gets worse as (20/12)^2, or (20/15)^2, so I think the smallest<br>
Pzz we can mention is 15% (Pz ~ 44%).<br>
<br>
i forgot to share the tech notes on ND3 polarization that Don sent me last<br>
week, although I think they are the same ones we used for the proposal. The<br>
field dependence is on p. 6 of the note on the research run in B28.<br>
<br>
My bet is that at constant microwave power, ND3 Pz will be definitely higher<br>
at 6.5 T than at 5 T. And remember that Pzz increases much faster than Pz,<br>
above Pz = 45%, so a 10% Pz increase results in more than 20% Pzz increase.<br>
So, even if Pz increased by only 10% from 5 to 6.5 T, we would gain a lot.<br>
<br>
Also there is FM modulation of the microwaves, which was used at SLAC, and I<br>
think at JLab too, which, if I recall correctly, it at least slows down the<br>
decay with dose.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
Oscar<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 22:50:54 +0000<br>
"Long, Elena" <<a href="mailto:Elena.Long@unh.edu">Elena.Long@unh.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
> Good evening,<br>
><br>
> Please see the attached plots for Pzz=15% and Pzz=12%<br>
><br>
> Take care,<br>
> Ellie<br>
><br>
><br>
> ________________________________<br>
>From: <a href="mailto:b1_ana-bounces@jlab.org">b1_ana-bounces@jlab.org</a> [<a href="mailto:b1_ana-bounces@jlab.org">b1_ana-bounces@jlab.org</a>] on behalf of Karl<br>
>Slifer [<a href="mailto:karl.slifer@unh.edu">karl.slifer@unh.edu</a>]<br>
> Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2013 5:03 PM<br>
> To: Dustin Keller; <a href="mailto:ellie@jlab.org">ellie@jlab.org</a>; <a href="mailto:b1_ana@jlab.org">b1_ana@jlab.org</a><br>
> Subject: Re: [b1_ana] slides<br>
><br>
><br>
> Hi Dustin,<br>
><br>
> Thanks for the plots. If Ellie can produce a 12% slide I'll include it as<br>
>backup. I suspect it will require reducing the number of x-points to 1 or<br>
>2.<br>
><br>
> Also, do you have the plot of ND3 pol versus B-field? Are the existing<br>
>cavities made for 7T or 7.5T?<br>
><br>
> thanks,<br>
><br>
> Karl<br>
><br>
><br>
> ---<br>
> Karl J. Slifer<br>
> Assistant Professor<br>
> University of New Hampshire<br>
> Telephone : <a href="tel:603-722-0695">603-722-0695</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Dustin Keller<br>
><<a href="mailto:dustin@jlab.org">dustin@jlab.org</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:dustin@jlab.org">dustin@jlab.org</a>>> wrote:<br>
> Also in a side conversation with don he was<br>
> highly recommending a backup slide that showed<br>
> projection for 12-15% Pzz demonstrating that<br>
> even with their down playing of the polarization<br>
> the experiment can still work. This is true for<br>
> systematics being its only a 20/15 factor increase<br>
> in the drift, probably around that with statistical<br>
> uncertainty increase as well.<br>
><br>
> dustin<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Sat, 15 Jun 2013, Dustin Keller wrote:<br>
><br>
> Here is some infor for the HB/tensor pol slides<br>
><br>
> <a href="https://userweb.jlab.org/~dustin/work/TargetFigs/">https://userweb.jlab.org/~dustin/work/TargetFigs/</a><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div>_______________________________________________<br>
b1_ana mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:b1_ana@jlab.org">b1_ana@jlab.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/b1_ana">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/b1_ana</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>