[BDXlist] Two-crystals comparison

Andrea Celentano Andrea.Celentano at ge.infn.it
Wed Jul 13 09:38:36 EDT 2016


Dear all,
please find attached a plot showing the comparison of the two crystals 
currently installed in the proto setup @LNS.
The same analysis have been applied to both, and the results are 
compared, in term of energy spectra, for:
* All events
* Event in anti-coincidence with inner-veto
* Event in anti-coincidence with inner-veto
* Event in anti-coincidence with both veto

Crs #1 is the one which was already installed in the setup.
The two integrated rates from 10 MeV are:

#Crs 1: 0.001 Hz
#Crs 2: 0.002 Hz
(already including the "out-of-time" correction, applied separately to 
each of them in the corresponding analysis)

-> The overall rate is the same for CRS1 and CRS2, i.e. there is NOT a 
factor x2 there!
-> The anti-coincidence rates, in any configuration, is larger for CRS2 
than CRS1

(Marzio, Mariangela, Luca: are the two crystals the same shape? I 
calibrated Crs2 assuming, for cosmics, the same energy deposition in 
MeV. This is true if the two crystals have the same thickness)


Bests,
Andrea
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: twoCrystalsComparison.png
Type: image/png
Size: 61839 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/bdxlist/attachments/20160713/5e66fd0a/attachment-0001.png>


More information about the BDXlist mailing list