[BDXlist] [EXTERNAL] BDX in JLab at 24 GeV white paper

Mon May 29 05:10:09 EDT 2023

Tomorrow I have a slot at 1PM-2PM  or after 6:00PM
Marco

Mariangela Bondì via BDXlist wrote:
> Also Tomorrow all day is ok for me
>
> M.
>
>> On 29 May 2023, at 10:21, lmarsicano via BDXlist <bdxlist at jlab.org> 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I am available today and tomorrow, wednesday in the morning.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Luca
>>
>> On 2023-05-29 10:11, Mariangela Bondì via BDXlist wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>> My slots are:
>>> - Today all day
>>> - Thursday all day
>>> - Wednesday after 18 (Rome time)
>>> Cheers
>>> Mariangela
>>>> On 29 May 2023, at 08:51, Marco Battaglieri via BDXlist
>>>> <bdxlist at jlab.org> wrote:
>>>> Dear all,
>>>> I think having a meeting is a good idea.
>>>> I will not be available on Thursday. What about Tuesday May 30 (any
>>>> time after 1:30PM CET)?
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Marco
>>>> Andrea Celentano via BDXlist wrote:
>>>>> Dear BDX colleagues,
>>>>> I write you concerning the message that Patrizia sent to the JLab
>>>>> community, related to the white paper currently being prepared to
>>>>> address the physics case for a 24 GeV energy upgrade at Jefferson
>>>>> Laboratory (see below) According to Patrizia’s message, the
>>>>> final goal is to have the white paper published on a referred
>>>>> journal.
>>>>> In Sec. 8.4, “secondary beams”, the projected sensitivity for
>>>>> BDX at 24 GeV is reported (see below). I think that having the BDX at 24
>>>>> GeV projection included in this work is really important. However,
>>>>> given that this result is going to be published in a journal, and
>>>>> thus available for the whole community, I think that, as BDX
>>>>> collaboration, we should discuss about how this result was
>>>>> obtained, and also how this is described in the text.
>>>>> For example, I think that in the text the fact that this is only a
>>>>> preliminary estimate should be stated (where the backgrounds at
>>>>> all evaluated)?
>>>>> Same for the detector arrangement: was the BDX at 24 GeV reach
>>>>> computed assuming the same detector configuration (detector
>>>>> dimensions and distance from the dump)? This cannot be the case,
>>>>> since the increased muons energy will require more shielding to
>>>>> range them out.
>>>>> Finally, I find the format of this plot quite uncommon, since the
>>>>> X axis is reported in a linear scale, and not log scale.
>>>>> I think that it would be important to have a dedicated BDX meeting
>>>>> for this next week.
>>>>> What do you think about? Usually, we held BDX meetings on Friday,
>>>>> but Friday June 2nd is holiday in Italy. What about Thursday in
>>>>> the early afternoon?
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Bests,
>>>>> Andrea
>>>>> <PastedGraphic-1.png>
>>>>> == PATRIZIA’S MESSAGE ==
>>>>> Dear colleagues,
>>>>> You are receiving this message because you expressed
>>>>> support for or participated in one of the many workshops
>>>>> aimed at pursuing an energy upgrade to 22 GeV of CEBAF
>>>>> with the goal of advancing the frontiers of our knowledge
>>>>> across the spectrum of topics in nuclear physics. This
>>>>> high-impact program at the luminosity frontier will open
>>>>> up a rich and unique experimental nuclear physics program
>>>>> that combines illustrious history with an exciting
>>>>> scientific future.
>>>>> After a year of intensive workshops, the editorial committee
>>>>> has collected input from the community and assembled a
>>>>> White Paper that outlines an exciting scientific program
>>>>> for the future at Jefferson Lab.  This document is openly
>>>>> available in the following link
>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__drive.google.com_file_d_1VQelVEu6Sz6Z9cxWV4nkrYMX7NzO1rUP&d=DwIDaQ&c=CJqEzB1piLOyyvZjb8YUQw&r=Ru7nA6zPBSFajtw1o6aZjchIV9Cs2SBk2RiVldzQhDc&m=LfVk6klWwdSULQ8CjNGZny65Xx2B4gDGoBbOivU7ISG_PEjNMcL7zCcPjwda2y8u&s=SIXcH7p9hwzI3Szv0v16QxVlPtGy4QnYSR7mM-Kui7k&e=[1]
>>>>> The initial author list contains the editorial committee
>>>>> as well as some others that have made direct contributions to the
>>>>> document, but we recognize that many beyond this initial list
>>>>> are the creators of this program.  This is a grass-roots effort
>>>>> that started with conversations amongst the recipients of this
>>>>> email.  You have all contributed directly or indirectly through
>>>>> participation in discussions, providing comments, and asking
>>>>> questions.  As such, we would like to invite you to sign the
>>>>> document as a coauthor by completing this form:
>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forms.gle_aQ6TKqGC2dnwMuGK6&d=DwIDaQ&c=CJqEzB1piLOyyvZjb8YUQw&r=Ru7nA6zPBSFajtw1o6aZjchIV9Cs2SBk2RiVldzQhDc&m=LfVk6klWwdSULQ8CjNGZny65Xx2B4gDGoBbOivU7ISG_PEjNMcL7zCcPjwda2y8u&s=kx4P2ldiMPn0y5cCwugwCv2OpB2S55iKVMtcu0UCrSY&e= [2]
>>>>> There may be others that have expressed interest in this program
>>>>> or contributed through discussions outside of the dedicated
>>>>> workshop
>>>>> series.  Please feel free to forward this message to others
>>>>> and extend the invitation to sign as a member of the broader
>>>>> community that generated this document.
>>>>> We acknowledge that given the breadth of the program it is
>>>>> challenging for a committee to represent the individual scientific
>>>>> interests of all members of the community with the same emphasis
>>>>> and detail as they would themselves.  However, we are unified in
>>>>> our goal of pursuing world class science.
>>>>> The deadline to sign as an author is June 7 at close of
>>>>> business (5 p.m. EDT). We are planning to submit to the arXiv
>>>>> after deadline and submit for publication in a refereed journal.
>>>>> On behalf of the editorial committee,
>>>>> Patrizia Rossi
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> BDXlist mailing list
>>>>> BDXlist at jlab.org
>>>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/bdxlist
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> BDXlist mailing list
>>>> BDXlist at jlab.org
>>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/bdxlist
>>> Links:
>>> ------
>>> [1]https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__drive.google.com_file_d_1VQelVEu6Sz6Z9cxWV4nkrYMX7NzO1rUP&d=DwMFaQ&c=CJqEzB1piLOyyvZjb8YUQw&r=Ru7nA6zPBSFajtw1o6aZjchIV9Cs2SBk2RiVldzQhDc&m=KRegf5qzSbd24c7aNlX-euj2Qt4K894uUtQZBpUAVxVmwGOBjwTCbiFKSP-9cYCI&s=GXJfqSdFiTOzgjRSnQd3nlPoRKseQLGNvljoavMFFUg&e=
>>> [2]https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forms.gle_aQ6TKqGC2dnwMuGK6&d=DwMFaQ&c=CJqEzB1piLOyyvZjb8YUQw&r=Ru7nA6zPBSFajtw1o6aZjchIV9Cs2SBk2RiVldzQhDc&m=KRegf5qzSbd24c7aNlX-euj2Qt4K894uUtQZBpUAVxVmwGOBjwTCbiFKSP-9cYCI&s=qY7WxpTGO6OH_LPT4EIXPMJ8K240P1Y0N3MRFrrc_w0&e=
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> BDXlist mailing list
>>> BDXlist at jlab.org <mailto:BDXlist at jlab.org>
>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/bdxlist
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> BDXlist mailing list
>> BDXlist at jlab.org <mailto:BDXlist at jlab.org>
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/bdxlist
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BDXlist mailing list
> BDXlist at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/bdxlist

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/bdxlist/attachments/20230529/e8dfc43b/attachment-0001.html>