[Bonuslist] Paper writing - IMPORTANT TO READ!

[Sebastian Kuhn]

Dear Bonusites,

we are gearing up for our grand publication, and today we tried to come up with a plan on who does what. Here is my understanding - please correct any misconceptions.

First, you can go to http://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/bonus/wiki/index.php/Papers to see all the files for the present versions of the analysis note and the outline of the paper ("BonusFrame"). Before we can ask the Deep Processes Physics Working Group of the CLAS collaboration for a review committee, we need to 1) Finalize the analysis note 2) flesh out the paper outline to indicate what we will be including. BTW, our consensus is that the paper should present ALL of the data (not just DIS); we will include either data tables at the end or a link to a depository (PRC maintains such depositories). We also agreed that we will leave in-depth analyses (like new PDF fits, duality analysis, etc.) to later papers with smaller author numbers.

1): Keith will take the lead working with Nate on the analysis note. Anybody else who would like to make comments and suggestions should send those to him and Nate. (I strongly encourage ALL of us to read what's there!) Sebastian will work on the chapter 5 part that discusses Slava's results (hopefully with input from Slava!?!), and Howard agreed to review the RTPC section. The other former BoNuS students (there are ONLY former ones now!) should at least look at the parts describing their contributions to the overall analysis - simulation, momentum corrections, ...

2): We need a title, authorlist, abstract, introduction, and conclusions, but that can wait until later. Here are suggestions about who should be doing what on the remaining sections:
I A: Can be cobbled together from the analysis note and/or our original proposal. Principals: Eric and Thia
I B: Eric and Thia (status of SFs). BTW: Add one more subsection "Resonance region and duality"
I C: Hopefully Wally M. is willing to write this section (on SF in nucleon, including tagging and its complications) WALLY?
III: Thia and Eric (previous experiments); I can add a little bit on "Deeps"
IV, V and VI: Will be cobbled together from analysis note; Keith and Sebastian will take responsibility. We probably want to add one picture showing F2n vs. Nachtmann variable for several Q^2, overlaid with present CTEQ DIS curves so we can make a comment on duality (full treatment would be in a later paper, see above)

Happy working - hopefully we're ready for PWG review within a month or so! - Sebastian