[Bonuslist] Fwd: Re: Ad Hoc review

Mon Jul 18 12:28:12 EDT 2011

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: Ad Hoc review
Date: 	Fri, 01 Jul 2011 15:15:44 +0100
From: 	Ken Livingston <Kenneth.Livingston at gla.ac.uk>
Reply-To: 	Kenneth.Livingston at gla.ac.uk
Organization: 	University of Glasgow
To: 	Sebastian Kuhn <skuhn at odu.edu>
CC: 	Marco Ripani <Marco.Ripani at ge.infn.it>, Ken Livingston 
<k.livingston at physics.gla.ac.uk>, PROCUREUR Sébastien 
<sebastien.procureur at cea.fr>, Stepan Stepanyan <stepanya at jlab.org>

Hi Sebastian,
I've attached the comments from the Ad hoc review committee on
*Measurement of the neutron F2 structure function via spectator tagging.

*I tried to use the new interface to initiate this review, but the
datbase server is down, So I've just attached at a text file with our
comments.

Regards,
Ken

On 06/10/2011 09:54 AM, Marco Ripani wrote:
>  Dear Ken,Sebastien,Stepan,
>  thank you for agreeing to serve as the Ad Hoc committee (with Ken as
>  chair) to review the draft of the CLAS Collaboration publication entitled
>  *Measurement of the neutron F2 structure function via spectator tagging*
>  by N. Baillie, S. Tkachenko, W. Melnitchouk, K. A. Griffioen, S. Kuhn
>  (contact), C. E. Keppel, M. E. Christy, H. Fenker, J. Zhang, S. Bueltmann.
>
>  **Please read carefully your charge below*.
>
>  *_Please consider that to conduct the review you may want to use the
>  new interface set up by Dan Protopopescu_. In order to do that you must
>  1) go to the shift management page<http://www.jlab.org/Hall-B/shifts/>
>  2) log in with your username/password (as you do for assigning shifts)
>  3) click the button "Reviews" in the list of items that you see after
>  logging in
>  4) look for this particular review where you will find the initial
>  manuscript and and will be able to upload your comments and where the
>  authors will upload their responses as well as subsequent versions of
>  the manuscript
>
>  The CLAS web page where you can find a draft of the manuscript to
>  review as well as previous material associated with this paper and
>  analysis work is
>
>  http://www.jlab.org/Hall-B/secure/bonus/publication/bonuspub.html
>
>  In your review, please consider the following:
>
>  1) The physics results in this draft have been approved by the Deep
>  Processes Physics Working Group.
>
>  You may assume that the experimental details have been examined and
>  discussed enough to satisfy the working group of the validity of the
>  data. This does not preclude you from asking questions of the authors
>  about their procedures, etc., but a careful review of the technical
>  aspects of this work has already been done and approved by the
>  analysis committee.
>
>  2) Are the physics conclusions of the paper defensible and well
>  supported?
>
>  3) Does this paper meet the publication criteria for the journal to
>  which it is targeted (PRL in this case) ?
>
>  4) Is the paper well written, balanced, and complete?
>
>  I would like to ask Ken, as chair, to coordinate the comments of the
>  Ad Hoc committee to the lead authors. The contact person is Sebastian
>  Kuhn (skuhn at odu.edu<mailto:skuhn at odu.edu>). He is being informedin CC
>  that you are reviewing this draft.
>
>  When your review concludes that the paper is ready to go to the whole
>  Collaboration, please inform me.The paper will then be released to the
>  entire collaboration for their review. If in the meantime you feel
>  that additional work is needed, you should work with the lead authors
>  and have any necessary improvements made.
>
>      **Please also be aware that after the draft goes to the
>  whole**Collaboration, your Ad Hoc Committee will be responsible for
>  adjudicating the comments and suggestions made by Collaboration
>  members about the paper, as per our Bylaw C3. That is, I will turn to
>  you again after the end of the collaboration wide review to make sure
>  all comments were addressed satisfactorily and that there is no
>  pending dispute.* *
>
>  Ken, please confirm that the review process is starting. I need not
>  receive copy of all subsequent e-mail exchange between your committee
>  and the lead authors, but I'll read with interest whatever I get.
>
>  Call or e-mail me if I can clarify any issues for you.
>
>  Best regards,
>  Marco
>  -- 
>
>  Marco Ripani
>  Senior Scientist, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare - Genova
>  Address:
>  INFN
>  Via Dodecaneso 33
>  16146 GENOVA - ITALY
>  tel./fax 39-010-3536458
>  cell. 39-328-2191138
>  Jlab office room F244
>  tel. 1-757-269-7266  fax 1-757-269-6273
>  E-Mail:ripani at ge.infn.it

-- 
=======================================================
Ken Livingston

Dept. of Physics&   Astronomy,        Tel: +44 141 330 6428
University of Glasgow,               Fax: +44 141 330 5889
Glasgow G12 8QQ.
Scotland. UK.
=======================================================

-- 
BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS
------------------------------------------------------

Teach CanIt if this mail (ID 524465277) is spam:
Spam:        https://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=524465277&m=a3ce941113e3&t=20110701&c=s
Not spam:    https://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=524465277&m=a3ce941113e3&t=20110701&c=n
Forget vote: https://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=524465277&m=a3ce941113e3&t=20110701&c=f
------------------------------------------------------
END-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/bonuslist/attachments/20110718/25b8e96b/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: BonusLetterComments1.txt
Url: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/bonuslist/attachments/20110718/25b8e96b/attachment.txt 