[Bonuslist] Long paper

[Sebastian Kuhn]

Dear Bonusites,

the AHC has send us their first round of comments on the long paper. Fortunately for us, they liked the paper - to quote:
"The committee thinks unanimously that the paper is carefully and thoughtfully written, with appealing results that stem out an impressive amount of analysis work. We do not think that there are significant issues with the paper, however we have some comments on clarity and editorial issues."

Therefore, they only had 400 ("some") comments for us (I am kidding you NOT). I hate to think what would have happened if they HADN'T liked the paper…

I have posted the paper in the exact version reviewed by them as well as their comments at the review website:
http://www.jlab.org/Hall-B/secure/bonus/kuhn/bonuspub.html
Feel free to have a look. For now we felt it was most efficient if Slava and I take care of as many of these comments as we can before bothering you with this. Nevertheless, if any of you has advice and suggestions (preferably in the form of fully formed sentences) for some of their more serious "Specific Physics comments" (or the general comment at the beginning), feel free to send our way.

- Sebastian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/bonuslist/attachments/20130729/a9e9d8e9/attachment.html