<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
  </head>
  <body>
    <title>B-team Meeting Notes</title>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
      charset=ISO-8859-1">
    <meta name="generator" content="Org-mode">
    <meta name="generated" content="2010-12-07 12:15:45 EST">
    <meta name="author" content="Arne Freyberger">
    <meta name="description" content="">
    <meta name="keywords" content="">
    <style type="text/css">
 <!--/*--><![CDATA[/*><!--*/
  html { font-family: Times, serif; font-size: 12pt; }
  .title  { text-align: center; }
  .todo   { color: red; }
  .done   { color: green; }
  .tag    { background-color: #add8e6; font-weight:normal }
  .target { }
  .timestamp { color: #bebebe; }
  .timestamp-kwd { color: #5f9ea0; }
  p.verse { margin-left: 3% }
  pre {
        border: 1pt solid #AEBDCC;
        background-color: #F3F5F7;
        padding: 5pt;
        font-family: courier, monospace;
        font-size: 90%;
        overflow:auto;
  }
  table { border-collapse: collapse; }
  td, th { vertical-align: top; }
  dt { font-weight: bold; }
  div.figure { padding: 0.5em; }
  div.figure p { text-align: center; }
  .linenr { font-size:smaller }
  .code-highlighted {background-color:#ffff00;}
  .org-info-js_info-navigation { border-style:none; }
  #org-info-js_console-label { font-size:10px; font-weight:bold;
                               white-space:nowrap; }
  .org-info-js_search-highlight {background-color:#ffff00; color:#000000;
                                 font-weight:bold; }
  /*]]>*/-->
</style>
    <script type="text/javascript">
<!--/*--><![CDATA[/*><!--*/
 function CodeHighlightOn(elem, id)
 {
   var target = document.getElementById(id);
   if(null != target) {
     elem.cacheClassElem = elem.className;
     elem.cacheClassTarget = target.className;
     target.className = "code-highlighted";
     elem.className   = "code-highlighted";
   }
 }
 function CodeHighlightOff(elem, id)
 {
   var target = document.getElementById(id);
   if(elem.cacheClassElem)
     elem.className = elem.cacheClassElem;
   if(elem.cacheClassTarget)
     target.className = elem.cacheClassTarget;
 }
/*]]>*///-->
</script>
    <div id="content">
      <div align="left">
      </div>
      Colleagues,<br>
          Todd is on travel,  I'll be leading tomorrow's B-Team.  
      Tomorrow's agenda and past meeting notes are below.  Please come
      prepared to talk to any items marked as TODO, INPROGRESS in  the
      notes of previous meetings.<br>
      <br>
      Also, it would be great to hear from QWeak (Paul can you identify
      someone to come to the B-team meeting and make this presentation?)
      about the beam's parity quality and  any other remaining  beam
      issues. <br>
      <br>
      Thanks,<br>
      Arne<br>
      <h1 class="title">B-team Agenda<br>
      </h1>
      <div id="outline-container-1" class="outline-2">
        <h2 id="sec-1"><span class="section-number-2">1</span> <span
            class="timestamp-wrapper"> <span class="timestamp">2010-12-08
              Wed 14:00</span></span> BTeam Agenda </h2>
        <div class="outline-text-2" id="text-1">
        </div>
        <div id="outline-container-1.1" class="outline-3">
          <h3 id="sec-1.1"><span class="section-number-3">1.1</span>
            Optics-on-Call Report    <span class="tag"><span
                class="Kazimi">Kazimi</span> <span class="Hofler">Hofler</span></span></h3>
          <div class="outline-text-3" id="text-1.1">
          </div>
        </div>
        <div id="outline-container-1.2" class="outline-3">
          <h3 id="sec-1.2"><span class="section-number-3">1.2</span>
            Beam Studies Report </h3>
          <div class="outline-text-3" id="text-1.2">
            <ul>
              <li id="sec-1.2.1">Summary of Heat-Activate <br>
              </li>
              <li id="sec-1.2.2">Parity Quality Beam Status Report    <span
                  class="tag"><span class="Qweak">Qweak</span></span><br>
              </li>
            </ul>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div id="outline-container-1.3" class="outline-3">
          <h3 id="sec-1.3"><span class="section-number-3">1.3</span>
            Beam Studies Planning </h3>
          <div class="outline-text-3" id="text-1.3">
          </div>
        </div>
        <div id="outline-container-1.4" class="outline-3">
          <h3 id="sec-1.4"><span class="section-number-3">1.4</span> BSY
            Diagnostics    <span class="tag"><span class="Benesch">Benesch</span></span></h3>
          <div class="outline-text-3" id="text-1.4">
            <p>Present updated table. B-team to prioritize the list
              based on
              desirability and known resource limits. The outcome of
              this
              discussion will be the plan that is executed.
            </p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div id="outline-container-1.5" class="outline-3">
          <h3 id="sec-1.5"><span class="section-number-3">1.5</span>
            12GeV Pathlength Requirements Status    <span class="tag"><span
                class="Tiefenback">Tiefenback</span></span></h3>
          <div class="outline-text-3" id="text-1.5">
            <p>Update on requirements table and overall documentation
              preparation.
            </p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div id="outline-container-1.6" class="outline-3">
          <h3 id="sec-1.6"><span class="section-number-3">1.6</span>
            ARC1 model    <span class="tag"><span class="Arne">Arne</span></span></h3>
          <div class="outline-text-3" id="text-1.6">
            <p>Results of the latest round of Arc1 modeling. </p>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div id="outline-container-2" class="outline-2">
        <h2 id="sec-2"><span class="section-number-2">2</span> <span
            class="timestamp-wrapper"> <span class="timestamp">2010-12-01
              Wed 14:00</span></span> BTeam Meeting–Notes </h2>
        <div class="outline-text-2" id="text-2">
        </div>
        <div id="outline-container-2.1" class="outline-3">
          <h3 id="sec-2.1"><span class="section-number-3">2.1</span>
            Optics-on-Call Report: Hofler </h3>
          <div class="outline-text-3" id="text-2.1">
            <p>Summary of the thankful week
            </p>
            <p>
              Fri: Hall C Compton scan – done.
            </p>
            <p>
              Weekend: Energy stability problems, gang phase lock still
              a problem? A power cycle may be required; readback may
              be invalid; also an observed current dependence in
              tracking.
            </p>
            <p>
              Wed: Hall C Compton backed out, halo counts up, fixed by
              rephasing. Need to get back through Compton. Still an open
              issue, should revisit after spot move on Thursday 12-02.
            </p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div id="outline-container-2.2" class="outline-3">
          <h3 id="sec-2.2"><span class="section-number-3">2.2</span>
            Beam Studies Report: All </h3>
          <div class="outline-text-3" id="text-2.2">
            <ul>
              <li id="sec-2.2.1">Pathlength Analysis: Yunn <br>
                Status of the analysis effort of the tunnel
                heating/pathlength
                five-pass test in September, final report due next week.
                Byung's
                draft report is attached. Fig 1 shows slower cooling
                than warming.
                12 GeV conditions will likely give RF shift of 2-3
                degrees/arc.
                15F LCW rise was half of 12 GeV conditions; concrete
                temp did not
                asymptote. Should we reperform this study with a longer
                test and/or
                higher temperature? Is this enough data to draw
                conclusions?
                <p>
                  Should we get a baseline to separate out baseline
                  pathlength
                  changes vs temperature-driven changes? This is small
                  compared
                  to expected effect. Estimate that these are acceptable
                  but more
                  numbers on air/wall temp and air conditioning
                  required. Should
                  pull sensors for data and compare, and plan to deliver
                  conclusions
                  before winter break (Tief).
                </p>
              </li>
              <li id="sec-2.2.2">Arc9 model calibration test: Roblin <br>
                <a
                  href="http://opsweb.acc.jlab.org/CSUEApps/atlis/task/10511">ATLiS
                  entry 10511</a>. Multiple RF FSD trips, ran fopt three
                times, not
                necessarily complete, requires data quality review by
                Yves.
              </li>
              <li id="sec-2.2.3">Hall C double peak source
                found/resolved? Suleiman <br>
                <a
href="http://opweb.acc.jlab.org/CSUEApps/elog/entry/1555706?PHPSESSID=eba0eb97d22d5f6c7ee0b57e9c387545">See
                  this elog entry</a>. Can we get a
                troubleshooting/diagnostic?
                Or have we lost some troubleshooting for low current by
                turning
                off the beam scraping monitor? It is a useful archived
                diagnostic
                and should evaluate whether we can turn it back on in
                future.
                We should ensure that it stays off until we want it back
                on.
                Was also used as low-level transfer function monitor,
                monitoring
                for changes in lattice. We will return to this in the
                future to
                see if it can be acceptably turned back on. We'll modify
                app and
                send signals to Qweak for monitoring in the meantime.
              </li>
            </ul>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div id="outline-container-2.3" class="outline-3">
          <h3 id="sec-2.3"><span class="section-number-3">2.3</span>
            Beam Studies Planning: All </h3>
          <div class="outline-text-3" id="text-2.3">
            <ul>
              <li id="sec-2.3.1">Thursday 2010-12-02 and Tuesday
                2010-12-07 Plans: Suggested <br>
                <ul>
                  <li id="sec-2.3.1.1">Tuesday 2010-12-07 <br>
                    CHL power switch uncertainties, injector cathode
                    activation (~12h).
                    TPE also scheduled to start operations at start of
                    evening shift.
                  </li>
                  <li id="sec-2.3.1.2">Compton backgrounds (hall A) <br>
                  </li>
                  <li id="sec-2.3.1.3">Injector development for Hall
                    C/Qweak (Dalton, Benesch), ~4h (to 12h?) <br>
                    <a
                      href="http://opsweb.acc.jlab.org/CSUEApps/atlis/task/10271">ATLiS
                      entry 10271</a>, Rebalance systematics, RHWP
                    scans/PC translation scans.
                    Was done before but with IHWP in wrong orientation.
                    Oops! May require
                    some time both days.
                    <p>
                      Estimate 4h Thu 12-02, 8h Tue 12-07 (laser table
                      in conjunction with
                      Cathode activation, total time 12h)
                    </p>
                  </li>
                  <li id="sec-2.3.1.4">One pass stripline BPM test, ~1h
                    <br>
                    <a
                      href="http://opsweb.acc.jlab.org/CSUEApps/atlis/task/10445">ATLiS
                      entry 10445</a>, Large dynamic range of currents
                    (100uA to >=100 nA CW)
                    for BPM linearity test. Access required, not time
                    critical; can wait
                    for next access.
                  </li>
                  <li id="sec-2.3.1.5">Repeat of Arc9 model calibration
                    test?, ~2h <br>
                    <a
                      href="http://opsweb.acc.jlab.org/CSUEApps/atlis/task/10511">ATLiS
                      entry 10511,</a> should wait for Yves evaluation
                    of existing data to see
                    if its enough for his analysis.
                  </li>
                  <li id="sec-2.3.1.6">Cryomodule JT valve test?, ~10h <br>
                    <a
                      href="http://opsweb.acc.jlab.org/CSUEApps/atlis/task/7874">ATLiS
                      entry 7874</a>, Has been lingering since June.
                    Requires beam off.
                    Also requires Jonathan Creel's availability.
                  </li>
                </ul>
              </li>
              <li id="sec-2.3.2">Thursday 2010-12-02 Plans: Decided <br>
                <ul>
                  <li id="sec-2.3.2.1">Move spot (0.5h) <br>
                  </li>
                  <li id="sec-2.3.2.2">Injector development for QWeak
                    (4h) <br>
                  </li>
                  <li id="sec-2.3.2.3">Compton background tuning
                    (0.5-1h) <br>
                  </li>
                </ul>
              </li>
              <li id="sec-2.3.3">Tuesday 2010-12-07 Plans: Decided <br>
                <ul>
                  <li id="sec-2.3.3.1">Injector development for QWeak,
                    laser table, cathode activation (8-12h) <br>
                  </li>
                </ul>
              </li>
            </ul>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div id="outline-container-2.4" class="outline-3">
          <h3 id="sec-2.4"><span class="section-number-3">2.4</span>
            FY11 BTeam Projects </h3>
          <div class="outline-text-3" id="text-2.4">
            <ul>
              <li id="sec-2.4.1">BSY Diagnostics: Benesch <br>
                Details of the FY11 BSY diagnostics effort: showed list
                of 5 diagnostics
                suggestions on overhead (FY11 diagnostic suggestions).
                Discussions of
                whether to relocate harps back to E03 crosses, or
                install new crosses
                in front of S10 girders for optics matching after each
                recombiner for
                12 GeV upgrade commissioning development.
                <ul>
                  <li id="sec-2.4.1.1"><span class="todo TODO"> TODO</span>
                    ATLiS to test optics measurements at 1E03/2S10
                    (before Jan 2011 optics) <br>
                  </li>
                  <li id="sec-2.4.1.2"><span class="todo TODO"> TODO</span>
                    Work up detailed tabular strawman, cost/resource
                    estimates (Benesch) <br>
                  </li>
                  <li id="sec-2.4.1.3"><span class="todo TODO"> TODO</span>
                    Cross-check injector harp optics match measurement
                    consistency <br>
                  </li>
                </ul>
              </li>
            </ul>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div id="outline-container-2.5" class="outline-3">
          <h3 id="sec-2.5"><span class="section-number-3">2.5</span>
            Anything else? </h3>
          <div class="outline-text-3" id="text-2.5">
            <ul>
              <li id="sec-2.5.1">Optics: Hofler, Kazimi <br>
              </li>
            </ul>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div id="outline-container-3" class="outline-2">
        <h2 id="sec-3"><span class="section-number-2">3</span> <span
            class="timestamp-wrapper"> <span class="timestamp">2010-11-17
              Wed 14:52</span></span> Agenda–Notes </h2>
        <div class="outline-text-2" id="text-3">
        </div>
        <div id="outline-container-3.1" class="outline-3">
          <h3 id="sec-3.1"><span class="section-number-3">3.1</span>
            Optics-on-Call Report    <span class="tag"><span
                class="Spata">Spata</span></span></h3>
          <div class="outline-text-3" id="text-3.1">
            <p>the 9.6kHz vertical easter egg hunt
            </p>
            <ul>
              <li>
                present focus is on the pre-buncher as the source or
                amplifier of
                the problem.
              </li>
              <li>
                Is there information to be gained by simulating or
                trying to
                simulating the effect? CASA will look into this.
              </li>
            </ul>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div id="outline-container-3.2" class="outline-3">
          <h3 id="sec-3.2"><span class="section-number-3">3.2</span>
            Beam Studies Report    <span class="tag"><span class="All">All</span></span></h3>
          <div class="outline-text-3" id="text-3.2">
            <ul>
              <li>
                M<sub>56</sub> issues, diagnostics and training. "The
                Friday Event"
                <ul>
                  <li>
                    what is the design sensitivity of the device?
                    10mV/degree? </li>
                  <li>
                    Injector to north linac match came late in the game,
                    but match
                    happened without too much issue.
                  </li>
                </ul>
              </li>
              <li>
                Two Wien setup
                <ul>
                  <li>
                    nice setup, too bad we mucked it up my pulling the
                    Vertical Wien
                    HV.
                  </li>
                  <li>
                    made more complicated then it needs to be by having
                    the
                    pre-buncher scrunched between the two Wiens. No
                    action, but Reza
                    should take note of this comment and incorporate it
                    into the 12GeV
                    injector design. In other words, we are going to
                    live with this
                    situation at least to the end of the 6GeV program.
                  </li>
                </ul>
              </li>
              <li id="sec-3.2.1"><span class="done DONE"> DONE</span>
                form a RAR committee to investigate Thursday/Friday tune
                time    <span class="tag"><span class="Krafft">Krafft</span> <span
                    class="Arne">Arne</span></span><br>
                <span class="timestamp-wrapper"><span
                    class="timestamp-kwd">DEADLINE: </span> <span
                    class="timestamp">2010-11-19 Fri</span></span><br>
                More than 8 hours of downtime is associated with the
                last Thursday and
                Friday activities. There is room for improvement and
                this event
                provides an opportunity to review how Optics tuning is
                performed,
                tools are calibrated/documented and any other
                operational aspects of
                achieving efficient deterministic beam tuning exercises.
              </li>
              <li id="sec-3.2.2"><span class="done DONE"> DONE</span>
                write charge to the committee    <span class="tag"><span
                    class="Krafft">Krafft</span> <span class="Arne">Arne</span></span><br>
                <span class="timestamp-wrapper"><span
                    class="timestamp-kwd">DEADLINE: </span> <span
                    class="timestamp">2010-11-23 Tue</span></span><br>
              </li>
              <li id="sec-3.2.3">Plans for Thursday and Tuesday Beam
                studies <br>
                <ul>
                  <li>
                    heat/activate schedule: To be determined by
                    Thursday's QE
                    scan. (0.5h)
                    <ul>
                      <li>
                        if needed to get through Thanksgiving, will do
                        this on Monday
                      </li>
                      <li>
                        otherwise defer to after Thanksgiving
                      </li>
                    </ul>
                  </li>
                  <li>
                    Re-instate the Vertical Wien (0.5h)
                  </li>
                  <li>
                    Investigate pre-buncher electronics (1h)
                  </li>
                  <li>
                    recalibrate the Vertical Wien
                  </li>
                  <li>
                    Reestablish high current setup with max gradient of
                    pre-buncher of
                    2.0? depends on what they find with the pre-buncher
                    investigation.
                  </li>
                  <li id="sec-3.2.3.1">pre-buncher options <br>
                    <ul>
                      <li>
                        network analyze the output of the amplifiers
                      </li>
                      <li>
                        install more supplemental amplifiers
                      </li>
                      <li>
                        run with reduced amplitudes on the pre-buncher
                      </li>
                    </ul>
                  </li>
                </ul>
              </li>
            </ul>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div id="outline-container-3.3" class="outline-3">
          <h3 id="sec-3.3"><span class="section-number-3">3.3</span>
            FY11 Bteam Projects </h3>
          <div class="outline-text-3" id="text-3.3">
            <ul>
              <li id="sec-3.3.1">12GeV Pathlength resolution <br>
                <span class="timestamp-wrapper"><span
                    class="timestamp-kwd">DEADLINE: </span> <span
                    class="timestamp">2010-12-20 Mon</span></span><br>
                finish off the 12GeV pathlength issues and get
                definitive answer from
                12GeV. Remaining issues:
                <ul>
                  <li id="sec-3.3.1.1"><span class="done DONE"> DONE</span>
                    Analysis of the Sep. 2010 LCW heatrise test    <span
                      class="tag"><span class="Krafft">Krafft</span> <span
                        class="ATTACH">ATTACH</span></span><br>
                    <span class="timestamp-wrapper"><span
                        class="timestamp-kwd">DEADLINE: </span> <span
                        class="timestamp">2010-12-06 Mon</span></span><br>
                    Write a tech-note summarizing the data and results.
                    No interpretation
                    required, that goes in the next document.
                    Jay is the contact point on the data. Casa will
                    supply the words and
                    analysis. The basic goal is to take all the pictures
                    in the Elog of
                    the pathlength scopes and from that calculate the
                    pathlength change as
                    a function of time. Overly or correlate the
                    temperature data (in a
                    separate file/format) with the pathlength data. From
                    this we should
                    be able to get some information on pathlength vs
                    tunnel temperature.
                    <p>
                      <span class="timestamp-wrapper"> <span
                          class="timestamp">2010-12-01 Wed</span></span><br>
                      Byung has analyzed the data and the results were
                      presented at the
                      B-team meeting. For Arc1 he observed about a
                      1degree of RF pathlength
                      increase for 1degree C in temperature rise. See
                      attached document.
                      Mark as done, although there are some suggested
                      improvements.
                    </p>
                  </li>
                  <li id="sec-3.3.1.2"><span class="todo TODO"> TODO</span>
                    document Update/table with agreed upon requirements
                       <span class="tag"><span class="Tiefen">Tiefen</span></span><br>
                    <span class="timestamp-wrapper"><span
                        class="timestamp-kwd">DEADLINE: </span> <span
                        class="timestamp">2010-12-06 Mon</span></span><br>
                    Finish/polish off Tief's tech-note on pathlength.
                    Include reference
                    of the Sept. LCW heat test to cap the maximum
                    excursion expected.
                    This is a requirements document, not a design
                    document.(just a reminder)
                  </li>
                  <li id="sec-3.3.1.3"><span class="todo TODO"> TODO</span>
                    Transfer to 12GeV    <span class="tag"><span
                        class="Pilat">Pilat</span> <span class="Arne">Arne</span> <span
                        class="Krafft">Krafft</span></span><br>
                    <span class="timestamp-wrapper"><span
                        class="timestamp-kwd">DEADLINE: </span> <span
                        class="timestamp">2010-12-20 Mon</span></span><br>
                  </li>
                </ul>
              </li>
              <li id="sec-3.3.2">Pathlenth adjustment via MO frequency
                changes <br>
                Develop the requirements for this new tool so that
                Eng/AHLA/Controls/OPS can work on developing a complete
                tool for
                routine operations.
                <ul>
                  <li id="sec-3.3.2.1"><span class="todo TODO"> TODO</span>
                    Draft of requirements    <span class="tag"><span
                        class="Tiefen">Tiefen</span></span><br>
                    <span class="timestamp-wrapper"><span
                        class="timestamp-kwd">DEADLINE: </span> <span
                        class="timestamp">2011-08-15 Mon</span></span><br>
                  </li>
                  <li id="sec-3.3.2.2"><span class="todo TODO"> TODO</span>
                    Project Charter written and team formed    <span
                      class="tag"><span class="Tiefen">Tiefen</span></span><br>
                    <span class="timestamp-wrapper"><span
                        class="timestamp-kwd">DEADLINE: </span> <span
                        class="timestamp">2011-09-19 Mon</span></span><br>
                  </li>
                  <li id="sec-3.3.2.3"><span class="todo TODO"> TODO</span>
                    Requirements review, reiterated upon and accepted
                       <span class="tag"><span class="BTEAM">BTEAM</span></span><br>
                    <span class="timestamp-wrapper"><span
                        class="timestamp-kwd">DEADLINE: </span> <span
                        class="timestamp">2011-10-03 Mon</span></span><br>
                  </li>
                  <li id="sec-3.3.2.4"><span class="todo TODO"> TODO</span>
                    Project goals, milestones and work effort
                    established    <span class="tag"><span class="AHLA">AHLA</span> <span
                        class="ENG">ENG</span> <span class="OPS">OPS</span></span><br>
                    <span class="timestamp-wrapper"><span
                        class="timestamp-kwd">DEADLINE: </span> <span
                        class="timestamp">2011-10-10 Mon</span></span><br>
                  </li>
                </ul>
              </li>
              <li id="sec-3.3.3">raytrace <br>
                If this is to be a part of the 12GeV tool chest, would
                like to see
                prototyping and requirements of what this tool is and
                how AHLA can
                help. LOCO techniques might be more applicable. Future
                talk to
                B-team from Yves on the path forward.
              </li>
              <li id="sec-3.3.4">Other 12GeV required projects? <br>
                <ul>
                  <li id="sec-3.3.4.1">shims on BW to test modeling of
                    dog-leg <br>
                    The shunts will be installed during the 6-months for
                    understanding
                    dog-legs? Power supply management issue. Low impact.
                  </li>
                  <li id="sec-3.3.4.2">Synchrotron light ports <br>
                    Arc9, Arc8, Arc7, Arc10, four in each arcs.
                    Arc8 would be best to do this summer, at least the
                    vacuum chambers.
                    <ul>
                      <li>
                        estimate is about 17k per synchrotron port. Is
                        this just the vacuum
                        chamber? </li>
                      <li>
                        benefit would be continuous monitoring of the
                        beam </li>
                      <li>
                        perhaps need 80k this year to do Arc8. </li>
                      <li>
                        Need to enter project into the AWP system.
                        Initially as an unfunded
                        priority and then we will see if it fits within
                        future AIP or
                        general RSR funding profiles.
                      </li>
                    </ul>
                  </li>
                  <li id="sec-3.3.4.3">Moving harps around <br>
                    completing the BSY diagnostic suite. This is funded
                    as the completion
                    of the AIP BSY.
                    <ul>
                      <li id="sec-3.3.4.3.1"><span class="todo
                          INPROGRESS"> INPROGRESS</span> Present final
                        plan    <span class="tag"><span class="Benesch">Benesch</span> <span
                            class="ATTACH">ATTACH</span></span><br>
                        <span class="timestamp-wrapper"><span
                            class="timestamp-kwd">DEADLINE: </span> <span
                            class="timestamp">2010-12-01 Wed</span></span><br>
                        Include upgrading quad power supplies to aid
                        collecting quad scan data
                        through the minimum.
                        <span class="timestamp-wrapper"> <span
                            class="timestamp">2010-12-01 Wed</span></span><br>
                        Jay present a table, see attached document.
                        Requested that he fill it
                        in a bit more and add priority.
                      </li>
                    </ul>
                  </li>
                </ul>
              </li>
            </ul>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div id="outline-container-3.4" class="outline-3">
          <h3 id="sec-3.4"><span class="section-number-3">3.4</span>
            Optics model update    <span class="tag"><span class="Arne">Arne</span></span></h3>
          <div class="outline-text-3" id="text-3.4">
            <p>This is a modest change/correction to the present design
              optics. The
              goal is to correct some errors that crept into the system,
              mostly in
              Arc1 and Arc2. My working notes are attached, these notes
              represent
              where I was on this project in April of this year.
              Basically Arc1 is
              in reasonable shape. I need to move onto Arc2 and then
              complete the
              process.
            </p>
            <p>
              For the Jan2011 download, no changes to the element
              definitions other
              than quad design strength will be made. Subsequent studies
              in the first
              half of 2011 will tell us if we need to change any dipole
              body
              gradients or RF modeling parameters. In other words this
              is a small
              change (see the table in the attached document)
            </p>
            <ul>
              <li>
                Arc1 ala elegant
              </li>
              <li>
                realtime CS tool? Geoff brought up the fact that if the
                elegant
                model is used to define the design, than the CS tool
                should
                reference the elegant model. Unfortunately upgraded CS
                tool to use
                the elegant infrastructure is not on the FY11 plan
                (probably
                hopefully FY12). Michael T. pointed out that the BPM
                noise is probably larger than
                the design noise. Looking over the table in the document
                there is
                one quad that has a 10% change between optim and
                elegant. Perhaps
                this quad will be noise. We will have to make note of
                these special
                quads. We can also think about converting from elegant
                to optim so
                that the CS tool will pick up these changes in the
                interim. No
                action other than a discussion with AHLA to see if there
                are any
                mitigating efforts that can/should be made.
              </li>
            </ul>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div id="outline-container-3.5" class="outline-3">
          <h3 id="sec-3.5"><span class="section-number-3">3.5</span>
            Anything else? </h3>
          <div class="outline-text-3" id="text-3.5">
            <ul>
              <li id="sec-3.5.1">Optics-on-call over Thanksgiving?    <span
                  class="tag"><span class="Krafft">Krafft</span> <span
                    class="Hofler">Hofler</span></span><br>
                Don't touch anything!
              </li>
            </ul>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div id="postamble">
        <p class="date"> Date: 2010-12-07 12:15:45 EST</p>
        <p class="creator">HTML generated by org-mode 6.33x in emacs 23</p>
      </div>
    </div>
    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
      charset=ISO-8859-1">
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Director of Accelerator Operations
Jefferson Lab           Office: (757) 269-6268  
12000 Jefferson Avenue  Cell:   (757) 876-6289  
Newport News, VA 23606  Email:  <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:freyberg@jlab.org">freyberg@jlab.org</a>
</pre>
  </body>
</html>