[Clas12_calcom] [EXTERNAL] Re: timelines for RGB F19-S20 ready for detector experts

[Zhiwen Zhao]

Chris

I always used latest main branch of clas12-timeline repo and never used 
any tag version.
I suppose other chefs do the same.

Should I reproduce timeline with the latest main branch now or I should 
wait for your suggestion?

Zhiwen

On 8/2/2023 11:31 AM, Christopher Dilks wrote:
> Dear Marco and Silvia,
> 
> Marco's changes were merged in on Monday. I haven't tagged a new release 
> yet since we have also merged in a few other general cleanup changes and 
> improvements, but I haven't had a chance to fully test everything yet 
> (currently automating testing, actually).
> 
> Let me know if there are any issues, and if so, I'll tag a stable 
> version with only Marco's change.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Chris
> 
> On 8/2/23 11:19, Marco Mirazita via Clas12_calcom wrote:
>> Dear Silvia,
>> these timelines does not have the fix on the RICH monitoring 
>> histograms that I committed on github just yesterday.
>> Is it possible to rerun with the latest version of the software?
>> Thank you,
>> Marco
>>
>>
>> Il 2023-08-02 17:11 silvia--- via Clas12_calcom ha scritto:
>>> Dear all,
>>> after completing FTOF and RF calibration, RGB F19-S20 is ready for the
>>> calibration of the other subsystems. Please check the timelines at
>>> https://clas12mon.jlab.org/rgb/pass0/v29.22/tlsummary/ , and let me and
>>> Zhiwen know which runs you need to have cooked for your subsystem.
>>> Ideally, it would be great if you provided, when possible, a run 
>>> range, so
>>> we can optimize the cooking for everyone.
>>> Thanks a lot for your support!
>>> Best regards,
>>> Silvia
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Clas12_calcom mailing list
>>> Clas12_calcom at jlab.org
>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_calcom
>> _______________________________________________
>> Clas12_calcom mailing list
>> Clas12_calcom at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_calcom