<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Dear All,<br>
you can find below a brief summary of what discussed and agreed at
the CalCom meeting last Friday in preparation of the commissioning
review.<br>
<br>
As promised I also created a doodle to schedule the next phone
conferences to review the talk drafts. Considering the many meetings
that are already scheduled in the morning (US time), the proposed
time slots are in the early afternoon to still allows participation
from Europe.<b> The link is <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://doodle.com/cewf543ai2736tpm">http://doodle.com/cewf543ai2736tpm</a> (note
that the time zone is US EST). </b>Please fill it as soon as you
can. The final dry runs will take place on Monday January 12.<br>
<br>
Last information, I received an email (that I just forwarded you)
with first comments on the commissioning plan by Elton Smith who is
the chair of the review panel. We should all consider Elton's points
in preparing our talks.<br>
<br>
Happy holidays!!<br>
Raffaella<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
12/9 CalCom meeting Minutes:<br>
participants: Cole, Dan, Dave, Gagik, Raffaella, Sergey, Volker<br>
<ul>
<li> the CWB review agenda will be modified, extending the time
allocated for presentation to the afternoon and including a
overview talks on the software organziation and status by
Veronique</li>
<li>Raffaella presented the draft of the overview talk on the CWB
plan. Several suggestions were made and she will modify the
slides accordingly. Among the more relevant points:</li>
<ul>
<li>the CWB will be introduced in the context of the broader
CLAS12 commissioning procedures;<br>
</li>
<li>DOE requirements will be included in the objectives of the
CWB;</li>
<li>the time duration of the different CWB phases will be
explained early on;</li>
<li>CWB priorities will be discussed to define which tasks could
be postponed if necessary.</li>
</ul>
<li>The scope of Sergey's talk was discussed: he should present an
overview of the DAQ and Trigger systems, outlining the
functionalities that will be available for the completion of the
CWB tasks.<br>
</li>
<li>The scope of Cole's talk was discussed and it was agreed that
he will focus on the commissioning of the forward carriage
detectors. This is relevant for the review both because the
pre-CWB calibration of the calorimeters is crucial since these
will be the primary source of the electron trigger and because
ongoing commissioning and calibration activities are the perfect
example of what can be done before beam delivery. It was also
agreed, that this talk will be move to an earlier time slot in
the agenda, after Raffaella's talk.</li>
<li>The scope<br>
</li>
<li>Veronique's draft slides were briefly shown: it was pointed
out that her talk should provide an overview of the software
organization and be an introduction to Gagik's and Maurizio's
talk.</li>
<li>Gagik's briefly showed the slides he has so far: it was
stressed that he should reduce the information given on the
common tools design and expand on how these tools will be used
to build the online and offline tools necessary for the CWB such
as monitoring calibration tools.</li>
<li>To further review the talk drafts, there will be a series of
phone conferences in the week of January 5. Final dry runs will
take pace on Monday January 12.<br>
</li>
</ul>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>