<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Dear Silvia and Raffaella,<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">There were several new runs in this timeline that were missing in the previous timeline v29.34:</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">11288: badly reconstructed SF and missing S4 (similar to the other BAND_FT 4 GeV runs). </div><div class="">11244: 4ns shift in ECAL timing but only for S1 (and again missing S4). From the FTOF tdc-fadc plot this appears to be a capture window shift and hence trigger timing shift. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I can make a CCDB update for 11244 by the end of the day. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Best regards,</div><div class="">Cole<br class=""><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><img apple-inline="yes" id="4D2910D8-A266-4E23-AE8C-9182F045682D" src="cid:9E181694-A51C-447C-88F8-427D0BD6479A@lan" class=""><br class=""><div><br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><img apple-inline="yes" id="4801571E-DFFF-4015-A322-6E120527C69E" src="cid:546C43A8-61A9-4086-80F9-B12496B8F44E@lan" class=""><br class=""><br class=""><img apple-inline="yes" id="F89C7077-441F-456C-A663-17E7DEDF165E" src="cid:DB0C1C39-D55A-4127-B370-B7429C771F92@lan" class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Oct 8, 2023, at 7:50 AM, Raffaella De Vita via Clas12_calcom <<a href="mailto:clas12_calcom@jlab.org" class="">clas12_calcom@jlab.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div class="">Dear Silvia,<br class=""><br class="">I checked the timelines:<br class=""><br class="">- the RF timeline looks good; the only outliers are runs with hardware problems;<br class="">- the FTCAL timelines show some residual timing shift for 4 run ranges while the pi0 mass is within specs. I already addressed these timing shifts but we will need another pass0.<br class="">- the FTHodo timelines are well within specs.<br class=""><br class="">Best regards,<br class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>Raffaella<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">On 6 Oct 2023, at 20:51, silvia--- via Clas12_calcom <<a href="mailto:clas12_calcom@jlab.org" class="">clas12_calcom@jlab.org</a>> wrote:<br class=""><br class="">Dear all,<br class="">the timelines for RGB F19/W20 are ready to be checked at this link:<br class=""><a href="https://clas12mon.jlab.org/rgb/pass0/v29.40/tlsummary/" class="">https://clas12mon.jlab.org/rgb/pass0/v29.40/tlsummary/</a><br class="">Please send me and Daniel feedback about your subsystem.<br class="">On my side, CND looks good, ready for pass2 review.<br class="">Best regards,<br class="">Silvia<br class=""><br class=""><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">Clas12_calcom mailing list<br class="">Clas12_calcom@jlab.org<br class="">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_calcom<br class=""><br class=""></blockquote><br class=""><br class=""><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">Clas12_calcom mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Clas12_calcom@jlab.org" class="">Clas12_calcom@jlab.org</a><br class="">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_calcom<br class=""></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></div></body></html>