<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Dear Silvia,<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">The missing 2.2 ECAL plots are due to missing re-assigned e- trigger bits during RG-C for that energy.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I used calibration and pass0 runs to evaluate calibration needs for energy and timing. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Energy (SF and pizero invariant mass) looks fine for 2.2 GeV and timing required two table entries which are now in CCDB (<a href="https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/4236819" class="">https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/4236819</a>).</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">ECOU timing has outliers in sector 4 starting at 16308 but this seems to be a tail skewing the fit. I’ll work some more on it but this shouldn’t stall pass1 review. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Best Regards,</div><div class="">Cole </div><div class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Dec 29, 2023, at 7:49 AM, silvia--- via Clas12_calcom <<a href="mailto:clas12_calcom@jlab.org" class="">clas12_calcom@jlab.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div class="">Dear detector experts,<br class="">I hope you're having a nice Christmas break. Following the recent<br class="">calibrations of several subsystems, we ran a new pass0 and produced new<br class="">timelines, RGC's gift to you :-)<br class="">The link is: <a href="https://clas12mon.jlab.org/rgc/Summer2022/pass0v0.17/tlsummary/" class="">https://clas12mon.jlab.org/rgc/Summer2022/pass0v0.17/tlsummary/</a><br class="">The recon files can be found at:<br class="">/volatile/clas12/rg-c/production/pass0/mon/v0.17/mon/recon/<br class="">From a quick glance, things look pretty good for most of the subsystems.<br class="">A few things I noticed:<br class="">- ECAL: SF and timing is out of specs for all the 2.2 data; we need to<br class="">decide once for all which runs to remove from our list due to the<br class="">bleedthrough from Hall C<br class="">- FTCAL: pi0 mass mean out of specs for runs: 16184 - 16194 (empty target<br class="">runs), 16271-16287, 16306-16309 (just slightly out of specs), 16396 -<br class="">16406 (the first few runs are trigger tests, but could still be good for<br class="">analysis, the last ones are ordinary prod runs), 16751 - 16772 (all the<br class="">end of the run period, prod runs)<br class="">- FTHODO: a few outliers for the MIPS time QA, aside from the runs that<br class="">Nick already informed me about, that cannot be calibrated<br class="">- HTCC: nphe/sec QA limits should be modified, and/or the timeline code<br class="">should be updated with Izzy's recent modifications.<br class="">- RF: runs 16089, 16096, 16089 are slightly off specs. The last two are<br class="">important as they are the lumi scans runs.<br class="">Please let me and Li (our chef) know of your cooking needs, in case you<br class="">need to do further calibration work. I'd like to call for the pass1 review<br class="">in a week or so, if possible.<br class="">Thank you and best regards,<br class="">Silvia<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">Clas12_calcom mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Clas12_calcom@jlab.org" class="">Clas12_calcom@jlab.org</a><br class="">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_calcom<br class=""></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>