<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Hi Cole,</p>
    <p>Thank you for checking that out.</p>
    <p>All the best,</p>
    <p>Izzy <br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 7/8/24 1:30 PM, L Smith wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:016F0E37-8233-4B3E-9D85-F4541A85264F@me.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div>H Izzy,</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>It is not just the several runs with 4 ns shifts.  All of the
        HTCC runs after run 16943 changed between pass0 1.06 and pass0
        1.07 and residuals are better clustered around zero..  The ECAL
        timing showed no shifts at all.  </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>Regards,</div>
      <div>Cole</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>1.07</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <img src="cid:part1.0uRzphHP.6GTlvf8F@jlab.org"
        alt="Screenshot 2024-07-08 at 1.16.42 PM.png" class=""
        width="1833">
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>1.06</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div><img src="cid:part2.iAQkmLh6.mJiQnDFi@jlab.org"
          alt="Screenshot 2024-07-08 at 1.16.27 PM.png" class=""
          width="1834">
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div><br id="lineBreakAtBeginningOfMessage">
            <div><br>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <div>On Jul 8, 2024, at 12:45 PM, Izzy Illari via
                  Clas12_calcom <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:clas12_calcom@jlab.org"><clas12_calcom@jlab.org></a> wrote:</div>
                <br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
                <div>
                  <meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
                    content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
                  <div>
                    <p>Dear Silvia,<br>
                      <br>
                      I have noticed for the HTCC that there is a
                      difference in the timing. For the previous
                      timelines, using raster calibration constants from
                      CCDB, HTCC timing is in spec and looks how I
                      expected:<br>
                      <span id="cid:part1.9m2kwIUW.x1L55CT0@jlab.org"><Screenshot
                        2024-07-08 at 12.43.03 PM.png></span></p>
                    <p>However, for the new timelines for RGC F22 using
                      an sqlite file with modified raster calibration
                      and beam offsets constants, several runs are now
                      out of spec for the timing:<br>
                      <span id="cid:part2.N14jJ4MT.PA9y8KUL@jlab.org"><Screenshot
                        2024-07-08 at 12.42.54 PM.png></span></p>
                    <p>And I know that I did not change anything on my
                      end for the HTCC timing for RGC F22. Are other
                      subsystems seeing similar issues?<br>
                      <br>
                      All the best,</p>
                    <p>Izzy<br>
                    </p>
                    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 7/8/24 11:39 AM,
                      silvia--- via Clas12_calcom wrote:<br>
                    </div>
                    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:d504e373cfc04258a8a46cf869097208.squirrel@webmail.jlab.org">
                      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">Dear CalCom,
we have produced new timelines for RGC F22 using an sqlite file with
modified raster calibration and beam offsets constants, produced using
Derek's displaced vertex analysis.
The link is: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://clas12mon.jlab.org/rgc/Fall2022/pass0v1.07/tlsummary/"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">https://clas12mon.jlab.org/rgc/Fall2022/pass0v1.07/tlsummary/</a>
The previous timelines, using raster calibration constants from CCDB, are
at this link:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://clas12mon.jlab.org/rgc/Fall2022/pass0v1.06/tlsummary/"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">https://clas12mon.jlab.org/rgc/Fall2022/pass0v1.06/tlsummary/</a>
Could you please look at your subsystem, compare the two timelines, and
let us know if you see any relevant changes in the calibration quality?
Thanks a lot!
Best regards,
Silvia


_______________________________________________
Clas12_calcom mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated moz-txt-link-freetext"
                      href="mailto:Clas12_calcom@jlab.org"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">Clas12_calcom@jlab.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_calcom"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_calcom</a>
</pre>
                    </blockquote>
                  </div>
                  _______________________________________________<br>
                  Clas12_calcom mailing list<br>
                  <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Clas12_calcom@jlab.org">Clas12_calcom@jlab.org</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_calcom">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_calcom</a><br>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
            </div>
            <br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>