[Clas12_first_exp] APS abstract from Ken

[burkert]

 From 4.5GeV^2 to 6GeV^2 is a more modest extrapolation. But is the role 
the 10.6 GeV data then play in that extrapolation?
V.



On 1/10/20 3:47 PM, Viktor Mokeev wrote:
> Hi Volker and Ken,
>
> Our framework published in PRC does allow us to extrapolate the N* 
> contribution towards Q^2=6.0 GeV^2. I propose Ken change the upper 
> boundary for the resonant contribution extrapolation.
>
>   Best Regards,
>
>                            Victor
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Clas12_first_exp <clas12_first_exp-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf 
> of burkert <burkert at jlab.org>
> *Sent:* Friday, January 10, 2020 3:43 PM
> *To:* clas12_first_exp at jlab.org <clas12_first_exp at jlab.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Clas12_first_exp] APS abstract from Ken
> I am sorry, but I seem to miss some part in that abstract.
> What framework enables us to *extrapolate* the resonance contribution 
> at Q^2 up to*4.5GeV^2 *to a Q^2 up to *1**0GeV^2 *and *with small 
> systematic uncertainties?
> *
>
> Volker
> *
> *
>
>
>
> On 1/10/20 3:27 PM, Latifa Elouadrhiri wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Please see in the link below the abstract to APS from Ken for your 
>> review and comment.
>>
>> https://userweb.jlab.org/~hicks/Hicks_Abstract_April2020.rtf
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Latifa
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Clas12_first_exp mailing list
>> Clas12_first_exp at jlab.org <mailto:Clas12_first_exp at jlab.org>
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_first_exp
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_first_exp/attachments/20200110/e0663aa4/attachment.html>