[Clas12_first_exp] [EXTERNAL] Re: APS abstract from Ken

burkert burkert at jlab.org
Fri Jan 10 16:32:47 EST 2020


Hi Ken,

The resonances up to 4.5GeV^2 data have been extracted from CLAS 
exclusive processes, but I have not seen any resonances extracted from 
the 10.6GeV inclusive data. That is why I am asking what role do the 
10.6GeV data play in the proposed presentation? The only thing I can see 
is that at the end of the presentation of the "framework" developed from 
the CLAS data, one could refer to the UPCOMING data from CLAS12 with 
higher precision. But this would be a CLAS presentation not a CLAS12 
presentation.

Volker



On 1/10/20 4:17 PM, Hicks, Kenneth wrote:
>
> Hi Volker,
>
> If I understand your question correctly, then my reply is to say that 
> I believe we have higher statistics from RG-A for this range of Q^2 
> than we did for CLAS.
>
> Ken
>
> *From: *Clas12_first_exp <clas12_first_exp-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf 
> of "burkert at jlab.org" <burkert at jlab.org>
> *Date: *Friday, January 10, 2020 at 4:11 PM
> *To: *Viktor Mokeev <mokeev at jlab.org>, "clas12_first_exp at jlab.org" 
> <clas12_first_exp at jlab.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [Clas12_first_exp] APS abstract from Ken
>
> If the idea is to present the extrapolation framework at the APS, that 
> is fine, but then what is the point of using the RG-A data for that?
>
> Volker
>
> On 1/10/20 4:00 PM, Viktor Mokeev wrote:
>
>     Hi Volker,
>
>      It is an extension of the CLAS data over Q^2 from 4.5 GeV^2 to
>     6.0 GeV^2. Te CLAS/CLAS12 results are only available data on
>     inclusive observables with the W coverage from threshold to
>     maximal W available.
>
>     We extended CLAS inclusive data above Q^2=4.0 GeV^2 where they
>     cover just the first resonance region.
>
>     Best Regards,
>
>     Victor
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     *From:*burkert <burkert at jlab.org> <mailto:burkert at jlab.org>
>     *Sent:* Friday, January 10, 2020 3:50 PM
>     *To:* Viktor Mokeev <mokeev at jlab.org> <mailto:mokeev at jlab.org>;
>     clas12_first_exp at jlab.org <mailto:clas12_first_exp at jlab.org>
>     <clas12_first_exp at jlab.org> <mailto:clas12_first_exp at jlab.org>
>     *Subject:* Re: [Clas12_first_exp] APS abstract from Ken
>
>     From 4.5GeV^2 to 6GeV^2 is a more modest extrapolation. But is the
>     role the 10.6 GeV data then play in that extrapolation?
>
>     V.
>
>     On 1/10/20 3:47 PM, Viktor Mokeev wrote:
>
>         Hi Volker and Ken,
>
>         Our framework published in PRC does allow us to extrapolate
>         the N* contribution towards Q^2=6.0 GeV^2. I propose Ken
>         change the upper boundary for the resonant contribution
>         extrapolation.
>
>           Best Regards,
>
>         Victor
>
>         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>         *From:*Clas12_first_exp <clas12_first_exp-bounces at jlab.org>
>         <mailto:clas12_first_exp-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf of
>         burkert <burkert at jlab.org> <mailto:burkert at jlab.org>
>         *Sent:* Friday, January 10, 2020 3:43 PM
>         *To:* clas12_first_exp at jlab.org
>         <mailto:clas12_first_exp at jlab.org> <clas12_first_exp at jlab.org>
>         <mailto:clas12_first_exp at jlab.org>
>         *Subject:* Re: [Clas12_first_exp] APS abstract from Ken
>
>         I am sorry, but I seem to miss some part in that abstract.
>
>         What framework enables us to *extrapolate* the resonance
>         contribution at Q^2 up to*4.5GeV^2 *to a Q^2 up to *10GeV^2
>         *and *with small systematic uncertainties? *
>
>         Volker
>
>         On 1/10/20 3:27 PM, Latifa Elouadrhiri wrote:
>
>             Dear all,
>
>             Please see in the link below the abstract to APS from Ken
>             for your review and comment.
>
>             https://userweb.jlab.org/~hicks/Hicks_Abstract_April2020.rtf
>             <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com_-3Furl-3Dhttps-3A-252F-252Fuserweb.jlab.org-252F-7Ehicks-252FHicks-5FAbstract-5FApril2020.rtf-26data-3D02-257C01-257Chicks-2540ohio.edu-257C43c1f069c0a047a21b4b08d79611a3db-257Cf3308007477c4a70888934611817c55a-257C0-257C0-257C637142874822531241-26sdata-3DhjQ3942UfguE3RIqzgtJqVH8wsox-252BX0t-252FOx2EjstEAg-253D-26reserved-3D0&d=DwMGaQ&c=CJqEzB1piLOyyvZjb8YUQw&r=vVqGQabj76hiyFv-SdFNhQ&m=AP81Da0ra710xOsXdQM3kfDVAz3tsmjzO4OkRzdP2M8&s=8naE3vBicXycUtDWwQRYmtHPZ6JVH-HVcEcF2SEmcgU&e=>
>
>             Best regards,
>
>             Latifa
>
>             _______________________________________________
>             Clas12_first_exp mailing list
>             Clas12_first_exp at jlab.org <mailto:Clas12_first_exp at jlab.org>
>             https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_first_exp
>             <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com_-3Furl-3Dhttps-253A-252F-252Fmailman.jlab.org-252Fmailman-252Flistinfo-252Fclas12-5Ffirst-5Fexp-26data-3D02-257C01-257Chicks-2540ohio.edu-257C43c1f069c0a047a21b4b08d79611a3db-257Cf3308007477c4a70888934611817c55a-257C0-257C0-257C637142874822531241-26sdata-3DoetTgwL843G8gT-252BkFmYfrRL1LZEHAxxmqxjSCUNdhzI-253D-26reserved-3D0&d=DwMGaQ&c=CJqEzB1piLOyyvZjb8YUQw&r=vVqGQabj76hiyFv-SdFNhQ&m=AP81Da0ra710xOsXdQM3kfDVAz3tsmjzO4OkRzdP2M8&s=cNTIqe-bW3Lu-fu1mnfdc5FO056LQqeDB2midMDPgfM&e=>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_first_exp/attachments/20200110/77bdafeb/attachment.html>


More information about the Clas12_first_exp mailing list