<div dir="ltr">Thanks Will<div><br><div>I will investigate this particular channel to better define the potential custom wagon</div></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 11:50 PM William Phelps <<a href="mailto:wphelps@jlab.org">wphelps@jlab.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div style="overflow-wrap: break-word;">Hello FX,<div><br></div><div>You are correct. The two FT skims have either 2 charged tracks or two photons, both with the electron required in the FT. </div><div><br></div><div>We could add a looser skim and see how large it is, but I would require a charged track instead of a pion. It is not currently possible to add a photon momentum cut without adding a custom wagon, which can be done. Let me know how you would like to proceed. </div><div><br></div><div>-Will</div><div><div><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>On Mar 6, 2019, at 5:35 PM, Francois-Xavier Girod <<a href="mailto:fxgirod@jlab.org" target="_blank">fxgirod@jlab.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="gmail-m_-452153919908383127Apple-interchange-newline"><div><div dir="ltr">Thanks for the reply Will<div>I think there is not skim e in FT + one pion + one photon currently</div><div>I am concerned that this skim would be too loose: will it be possible to apply more strict cuts in the future, here namely a cut on the photon energy to be above a few GeV for instance?</div><div>I think we discussed having custom wagons before but I don't know if this was implemented yet</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 11:32 PM William Phelps <<a href="mailto:wphelps@jlab.org" target="_blank">wphelps@jlab.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div>Hello FX,</div><div><br></div>There is a filtering scheme in the README.txt file. I have included the skims that I think are relevant for you and a tabular summary of the skims (which is slightly out of date since it excludes the epiN skim). <div><br></div><div>If you would like a more specific skim that doesn’t overlap with other skims too much I would be happy to add it.</div><div><br></div><div>Also, I will update the RGA Analysis wiki page to make it more clear what the skims are similar to the table I have attached. I hope I have answered your question, please let me know if you have any other questions.<br><div><br></div><div>-Will<br><div><br></div><div></div></div></div></div><div><div><div><div></div><div><br>#################################################### MESONEX-VERYSTRANGE<br># Electron and Pi0 in FT<br> PIZERO:<br> id: 2<br> tagger: 11:22:22:X+:X-:Xn<br># Twon pions with Electron in FT<br> TwoPionFTa:<br> id: 3<br> tagger: 11:X+:X-:Xn<br> forward: 1+:1-:X+:X-:Xn<br> TwoPionFTb:<br> id: 3<br> tagger: 11:X+:X-:Xn<br> forward: 2+:X+:X-:Xn<br> TwoPionFTc:<br> id: 3<br> tagger: 11:X+:X-:Xn<br> forward: 1+:X+:X-:Xn<br> central: 1+:X+:X-:Xn<br> TwoPionFTd:<br> id: 3<br> tagger: 11:X+:X-:Xn<br> forward: 1-:X+:X-:Xn<br> central: 1+:X+:X-:Xn<br> TwoPionFTe:<br> id: 3<br> tagger: 11:X+:X-:Xn<br> central: 2+:X+:X-:Xn<br> TwoPionFTf:<br> id: 3 <br> tagger: 11:X+:X-:Xn<br> forward: 1+:X+:X-:Xn<br> central: 1-:X+:X-:Xn<br> TwoPionFTg:<br> id: 3<br> tagger: 11:X+:X-:Xn<br> central: 1+:1-:X+:X-:Xn<br><br><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>On Mar 6, 2019, at 5:17 PM, Francois-Xavier Girod <<a href="mailto:fxgirod@jlab.org" target="_blank">fxgirod@jlab.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="gmail-m_-452153919908383127gmail-m_5182387409175401754Apple-interchange-newline"><div><div dir="ltr">Dear Will<div><br></div><div>I am not quite sure I can read the filter logic still, so maybe I will just ask directly</div><div>I am interested in events with one electron in the forward tagger, at least one pion anywhere, and at least one photon anywhere. </div><div>Is this currently available? Seems to me like a no...</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks</div><div><br></div><div>Best regard</div><div>FX</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 10:58 PM William Phelps <<a href="mailto:wphelps@jlab.org" target="_blank">wphelps@jlab.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hello All,<br>
<br>
I have finished running the trains over the recently cooked full runs. Please have a look and let me know if you have any questions! Also, please let me know if you have requests for additional wagons/skims for the future.<br>
<br>
They are located here: /work/clas12/clas12/data/trains/v2/<br>
There is a README.txt file that details the contents of the skim.<br>
<br>
Spring 2018:<br>
4013<br>
<br>
Fall 2018:<br>
5000, 5001, 5030, 5036, 5038, 5046, 5117<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
-Will<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Clas12_first_exp mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Clas12_first_exp@jlab.org" target="_blank">Clas12_first_exp@jlab.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_first_exp" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_first_exp</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
</div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div>
</div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></blockquote></div>