<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="overflow-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;">
Dear RGA,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I wanted to confirm that all of the dsts have completed cooking and also to warn that, if you so happen to investigate the luminosity scans for any reason, that runs 4180 and 4177 (the higher currents) are taken with a separate trigger that should probably
not be directly compared to 4302 and 4303 (the lower currents).</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Looking forward to a discussion of final validations on Wednesday,</div>
<div>Timothy<br id="lineBreakAtBeginningOfMessage">
<div><br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>On Feb 6, 2025, at 10:38 PM, Timothy Hayward <haywardt@mit.edu> wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div>
<div style="overflow-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;">
Dear RGA,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Although many of the workflows seem to be stuck at around 95% (if you stick to using the trains that won’t be a problem as they only appear in the train outputs when completed), I wanted to send out this email now to give you as much time as possible to
have a look at the Spring 2018 physics validation runs before next Wednesday. Unfortunately, the previous runs that I sent out were cooked with the wrong AI network (they used the Fall 2018 versions which should amount to about a 1% difference at most) and
were critically missing the helicity information. The new directories should be the final versions.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><b>10 GeV inbending </b>(currently only 4/7 runs with completed trains but the rest could appear at any moment)</div>
<div>/volatile/clas12/rg-a/production/pass0/Spring18/dst/rga_sp18_inb_10GeV_physics_1/dst/train/</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><b>10 GeV outbending </b></div>
<div>/volatile/clas12/rg-a/production/pass0/Spring18/dst/rga_sp18_outb_10GeV_physics/dst/train/</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><b>6 GeV inbending</b></div>
<div>/volatile/clas12/rg-a/production/pass0/Spring18/dst/rga_sp18_inb_6GeV_physics/dst/train/</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><b>6 GeV outbending</b> (currently no runs with completed trains but they could appear at any moment)</div>
<div>/volatile/clas12/rg-a/production/pass0/Spring18/dst/rga_sp18_outb_6GeV_physics/dst/train/</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><b>inbending luminosity scan</b> (4302 - 10 nA, 4303 - 30 nA, 4180 - 50 nA, 4177 - 75 nA)</div>
<div>/volatile/clas12/rg-a/production/pass0/Spring18/dst/rga_sp18_inb_10GeV_luminosity_scan/dst/train/</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><b>outbending luminosity scan</b> (3210 - 25 nA, 3970 - 45 nA, 3987 - 45 nA)</div>
<div>/volatile/clas12/rg-a/production/pass0/Spring18/dst/rga_sp18_outb_10GeV_luminosity_scan_1/dst/train/</div>
<div>/volatile/clas12/rg-a/production/pass0/Spring18/dst/rga_sp18_outb_10GeV_luminosity_scan_2/dst/train/</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Where possible, comparisons to Fall 2018 results (without using developed post-processing algorithms like momentum corrections) would be particularly useful. There have already been a few analyses and so far things look very promising. Please let me know
if you have any questions. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best,</div>
<div>Timothy</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</body>
</html>