[Clas12_rgb] do we really need the empty target run?

Stepan Stepanyan stepanya at jlab.org
Wed Jan 29 17:15:39 EST 2020


I was favor of NOT having empty target run at yesterdays meeting and I have the same opinion now. 

Stepan 

> On Jan 29, 2020, at 5:11 PM, silvia at jlab.org wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
> in the spring run we took 174M events with empty target, and in the fall
> we took 51M more. Do we really need to take more empty target data
> tonight?
> The only difference between the spring data and now is the beam energy,
> while in the fall we had same energy as now but opposite torus polarity.
> I am just asking this because we finally have a very very nice beam, and
> it seems a bit sad to waste 5 hours of it for data that maybe no one will
> ever analyze. Or will anyone? It wasn't clear at yesterda's RC meeting...
> Thanks for your feedback - and don't forget tomorrow's party at noon at
> the ResFac!
> Silvia
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Clas12_rgb mailing list
> Clas12_rgb at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_rgb




More information about the Clas12_rgb mailing list