[Clas12_rgb] Fwd: [EXTERNAL] Re: pass2 review request for RGB F19/W20

[Silvia Niccolai]

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Marco Battaglieri <battaglieri at ge.infn.it>
> Date: 1 December 2023 at 17:08:21 CET
> To: wphelps at jlab.org
> Cc: silvia at jlab.org, carman at jlab.org, mirazita at lnf.infn.it, Patrick Achenbach <patricka at jlab.org>, Larry Weinstein <weinstei at jlab.org>, Cole Smith <lcsmith at jlab.org>, Nathan Baltzell <baltzell at jlab.org>, Raffaella De Vita <devita at ge.infn.it>
> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: pass2 review request for RGB F19/W20
> 
> Dear Will,
> the review committee found RGB's response to our recommendations complete and satisfactory.
> Our suggestion is to give RGB the green light to proceed with pass2 reconstruction of  F19/W20 data set.
> Considering that other RGs are on the list, we suggest to start RGB cooking asap.
> Cheers
> Marco
> 
> silvia at jlab.org wrote:
>> Dear Marco, review committee members, and Will,
>> please find in attachment our replies to the three recommendations that
>> were brought up in the pass2 review for RGB F19/W20.
>> We hope you'll be satisfied and that the CCC will give us the green light
>> to start pass2 processing for our datasets.
>> Thank you very much for your work and support.
>> Best regards,
>> Silvia, on behalf of RGB
>> 
>>> Dear Will,
>>> here in attachment the report of RG-B Fall 2019/ Winter 2020 pass-2 data
>>> cooking review.
>>> Bottom line is that the review committee encourages the CCC to give the
>>> green light for RG-B pass-2 data cooking
>>> after consideration of  some recommendations.
>>> Do not hesitate to contact me in case anything is unclear or you need
>>> more details/explanations.
>>> I'd like to thank Silvia (as well as the whole RG-B crew) for their
>>> thorough presentation of the job done.
>>> 
>>> During the review we had a thorough a discussion about the need of
>>> comparing PASS2 to PASS1 results, in particular the ones that are about
>>> to be published .
>>> As a collaboration, we shall be very careful in releasing results based
>>> on pass1Â  that may be contradicted by the more reliable and precise
>>> PASS2 results.
>>> An adequate estimate of the systematic error, especially for pass1-based
>>> results should be done to avoid to arbitrarily increase systematics on
>>> pass2 results to seek backward compatibility.
>>> This is clearly not limited to RGB but affect all RGs undergoing to
>>> pass2 and trequires feedback from the whole Collaboration.
>>>  Â For the next reviews it would be good to update the charge with some
>>> mention to that, after that the Collaboration will define the best
>>> strategy.
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> Marco
>>> 
>>> 
>>> silvia at jlab.org wrote:
>>>> Dear Marco and Will,
>>>> on behalf of Run-Group B I'd like to request a pass2 review for our
>>>> Fall19
>>>> and Winter20 periods. We have completed the calibrations, and it was
>>>> agreed within the CalCom group that the times are ripe to proceed with
>>>> the
>>>> review.
>>>> If you could please check with the committee to find suitable dates, it
>>>> would be great.
>>>> Thank you very much!
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Silvia
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_rgb/attachments/20231201/ce7049ea/attachment.html>