<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto">Hi Daria, <div>That’s fine. I was just informing about the imminent new Coatjava. </div><div>Best regards, </div><div>Silvia<br><br><div dir="ltr">Sent from my iPhone</div><div dir="ltr"><br><blockquote type="cite">On 5 Dec 2019, at 12:21, Daria Sokhan <daria@jlab.org> wrote:<br><br></blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">Hi Silvia,<br><br>I asked Zhiwen to cook a couple of runs for calibration because FTOF needed it -- there will be adjustments to its settings as a result. This wasn't production yet.<br><br>Cheers,<br>Daria<br><br><br><br>On Thursday, 5 December 2019, <<a href="mailto:silvia@jlab.org">silvia@jlab.org</a>> wrote:<br>> Hi Zhiwen,<br>> just to inform you, last week we found a bug in the reconstruction of the<br>> CVT path length for the CND, so we have asked to Raffaella and Veronique<br>> to have a new tagged version of coatjava that we can use for RGB<br>> calibrations and cooking. It will also include the CD veto for charged<br>> particles.<br>> So be prepared to soon switch to that. With the current version it makes<br>> no sense to attempt to calibrate the CND, as it will have the wrong path<br>> length and will need to be redone anyway.<br>><br>> Also, we had come up with a plan for the calibration of the spring run, as<br>> far as sequence of runs and subsystems to be calibrated. I think we should<br>> adopt the same for the fall run, to minimize iterations. I understand that<br>> for now the main point is only monitoring to check detectors performances,<br>> so I am ok with whatever cookings you're doing :-)<br>><br>> The plan we had for the spring data was:<br>> Cook 6156 (first good production run) to make FTOF and DC calib filter<br>> →calibrate<br>> Recook 10 files/run for the RF calibration<br>> Once RF is calibrated, another 10 files/run pass to make monitors and<br>> timelines<br>> Establish the runs that need timing recalibration using timelines<br>> Cook and filter these runs and calibrate (FTOF first, then recook and do<br>> ECAL, CTOF, CND, BAND)<br>><br>> So I think we should adopt the same plan once the real production data<br>> taking has started for the current run Ipick the first good production run<br>> and make FTOF and DC calib first...).<br>><br>> Best regards and thanks a lot to both!<br>> Silvia<br>><br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Clas12_rgb mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:Clas12_rgb@jlab.org">Clas12_rgb@jlab.org</a><br>> <a href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_rgb">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_rgb</a><br>>
</div></blockquote></div></body></html>