<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto">Hello all, <div>FYI, we can proceed to cook Winter!</div><div>Thanks to all who contributed!</div><div>Best regards,</div><div>Silvia<br><div><div dir="ltr"><br>Begin forwarded message:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><b>From:</b> Stepan Stepanyan <stepanya@jlab.org><br><b>Date:</b> 9 February 2021 at 18:13:41 CET<br><b>To:</b> Silvia Niccolai <silvia.niccolai@ijclab.in2p3.fr>, Kyungseon Joo <kyungseon.joo@uconn.edu><br><b>Cc:</b> Yordanka Ilieva <jordanka@jlab.org>, lweinste <lweinste@odu.edu>, Zhiwen Zhao <zwzhao@jlab.org>, Marco Mirazita <Marco.Mirazita@lnf.infn.it>, Marco Battaglieri <battagli@jlab.org>, baltzell <baltzell@jlab.org>, Cole Smith <lcsmith@jlab.org>, Bryan McKinnon <bryan.mckinnon@glasgow.ac.uk>, devita <devita@ge.infn.it>, mcontalb <mcontalb@fe.infn.it>, lamiomar <lamiomar@gmail.com><br><b>Subject:</b> <b>Re: [EXTERNAL] new version of replies for RGB-Winter pass1 review</b><br><br></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><div class=""><div><div class="">Dear Silvia,</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Thank you for the response. The review committee finds your replies satisfactory, and we approve your pass1 readiness. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Dear Kyungseon,</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">As the committee concerns, RG-B is ready to process the winter 2020 data set.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Regards, Stepan</div><div class="">For the committee.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Feb 9, 2021, at 8:01 AM, Silvia Niccolai <<a href="mailto:silvia.niccolai@ijclab.in2p3.fr" class="">silvia.niccolai@ijclab.in2p3.fr</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" class="">
<div class=""><div style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;" class=""><div class="">Dear Stepan and dear review committee,</div><div class="">in attachment you'll find an updated version of our replies to the pass1 review of RGB Winter. Slide 1 has slightly changed compared to the previous edition, and there is a new slide 2 in addition: it contains figures produced by Yordanka, showing the 1D projections (with number of counts) of the electrons from the SF plots, for two values of momentum cut. The yield of S4 is not higher than those of the other sectors. We think that the apparent higher yield in S4 (and similarly in S6) is an effect due to the independent autoscaling of the six 2D plots. It can be noticed that the other 4 sectors show a slightly higher event population outside of the electron band, in the bottom right side (around p~8 GeV, more evident for S2, S3 and S5). It may be that the differences between sectors in the populations of the "electron band" relative to the region outside of it cause the differences in the adopted color scales. </div><div class="">Please let us know if there are any other aspects to address or discuss. </div><div class="">Thanks a lot and best regards,</div><div class="">Silvia</div><div class=""><br data-mce-bogus="1" class=""></div></div></div><span id="cid:3291913A-A97D-4466-B489-0586279096D6@fios-router.home"><replies_review_RGB_winter.pdf></span></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></div></blockquote></div></div></body></html>