<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
Silvia,
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">I looked over your draft of the reply slides. A few comments that I noted I pass along:</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">1) Charge #1: I do not believe that the LTCC calibration was deemed acceptable at the pass-2 review and</div>
<div class="">work was done to update the calibration and timelines. This is in addition to CTOF.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">2) Charge #3: At the efficiency task force meeting today, we discussed on the ongoing validation of the</div>
<div class="">hardware knockout tables across the different subsystems. This work is mostly done with some last items</div>
<div class="">lingering into next week. Florian can provide links to the validation studies.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">3) Charge #4:</div>
<div class=""> - The vz cut on the CVT dip angle of 1 cm is not yet finalized (at least within RG-A and RG-K) as studies</div>
<div class=""> of reactions with a detached vertex are probing the losses with a 1 cm cut vs. a 10 cm cut. This work</div>
<div class=""> will conclude (I am doing the studies for K+Lambda) in the first part of next week.</div>
<div class=""> - Note that for the events with pT < 180 MeV, the issue is not with a bad chi2pid, the issue is that there</div>
<div class=""> is no CTOF hit and this is required by the Event Builder for a PID assignment.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">4) Charge #6:</div>
<div class=""> - I think there are two parts of the discussion here comparing pass-1 to pass-2 software. One is acceptance,</div>
<div class=""> but the more important one is efficiency. I think plots from both data and Monte Carlo would be appropriate</div>
<div class=""> (at least on a wikipage) with a summary in your reply to the committee. I think it appropriate to have comparisons</div>
<div class=""> for both the Forward Detector and the Central Detector.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Regards,</div>
<div class="">Daniel</div>
<div class="">
<div><br class="">
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">On Dec 16, 2022, at 12:40 PM, Silvia Niccolai via Clas12_rgb <<a href="mailto:clas12_rgb@jlab.org" class="">clas12_rgb@jlab.org</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div class="">
<div class="">Dear all,<br class="">
I have prepared a rough draft of replies to the recommendations of the<br class="">
pass2 review. I will include this in the review wiki page along with links<br class="">
to all the relevant documentation (timelines, presentations of<br class="">
cross-checks, etc).<br class="">
Please let me know if you have comments/corrections/suggestions.<br class="">
In particular, I'd love some help to reply to the last question, where I<br class="">
wrote "NOT SURE OF WHAT ELSE TO SAY ON THIS POINT". I am not sure if they<br class="">
expect a new kind of QA timeline relying only on CD quantities, or if they<br class="">
want us to define what are the key plots to evaluate the choice of<br class="">
reconstruction (maybe Yuri's validation figures for the MC+background,<br class="">
then?). Some help on this point is highly appreciated.<br class="">
Thanks a lot and best regards,<br class="">
Silvia<br class="">
<span id="cid:773A58C9-2FC1-4836-98F2-49BF6BFEA090"><reply_pass2_review.pdf></span>_______________________________________________<br class="">
Clas12_rgb mailing list<br class="">
<a href="mailto:Clas12_rgb@jlab.org" class="">Clas12_rgb@jlab.org</a><br class="">
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_rgb<br class="">
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br class="">
<div class="">
<div dir="auto" style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
<div dir="auto" style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
***************************************************************************<br class="">
* <br class="">
* Dr. Daniel S. Carman <a href="mailto:carman@jlab.org" class="">e-mail : carman@jlab.org</a> <br class="">
* Staff Scientist office : (757)-269-5586<br class="">
* Jefferson Laboratory web: <a href="http://userweb.jlab.org/~carman" class="">http://userweb.jlab.org/~carman</a> <br class="">
* <br class="">
<div>***************************************************************************</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
</div>
<br class="">
</div>
</body>
</html>