<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:DengXian;
panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Aptos;
panose-1:2 11 0 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"\@DengXian";
panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ligatures:none;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#467886" vlink="#96607D" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif">Sorry for being late, everyone. As you could tell, I was having a lot of computer issues this morning.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif">For the PAC, my answer right now would be that we are considering other geometries for the field direction. These all have negative impacts on the target design and construction that we have
to weigh against the possible advantages of directing the sheet of flame into two torus coils. For now, we are taking as conservative approach as possible.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif">Simply rotating the magnet 90 degrees and using a tall, thin vacuum chamber is a straightforward solution, but it might not fit inside the HTCC. I’ll try to look at it more closely before the
PAC.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif">Rotating the target cryostat 30 degrees is more difficult from a structural point of view. The superconducting magnet (200 kg) is typically suspended from the top of the cryostat using thin-walled
stainless tubes in order to reduce heat conduction. In this geometry the tubes are in *<b>tension</b>* only and do not experience any side loads which would cause them to buckle. We actually transported the Hall C polarized target using a swinging cradle,
so that it always stayed in a vertical orientation when we drove it down the Hall C truck ramp. (We learned this from experience…) It’s not impossible, but it will require more engineering and time.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif">Chris<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div id="mail-editor-reference-message-container">
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">From:
</span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">Marco Contalbrigo <mcontalb@fe.infn.it><br>
<b>Date: </b>Monday, June 3, 2024 at 8:26 AM<br>
<b>To: </b>Christopher Keith <ckeith@jlab.org><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [EXTERNAL] RGH meeting<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">DEar Chris,<br>
we are meeting, but I do not see you....<br>
'<br>
On Sun, 2 Jun 2024, Christopher Keith wrote:<br>
<br>
> <br>
> Hi Marco,<br>
> <br>
> Sorry for the delayed response. Yes, I should be able to attend the meeting tomorrow morning, and I can show a few slides to discuss the magnet?s orientation.<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> See you tomorrow,<br>
> <br>
> Chris<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Christopher Keith, PhD<br>
> <br>
> Group Leader, Polarized and Cryogenic Targets<br>
> <br>
> Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility<br>
> <br>
> 12000 Jefferson Ave.<br>
> <br>
> Newport News, VA 23606<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> A picture containing text, device, gauge Description automatically generated<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> From: Marco Contalbrigo <mcontalb@fe.infn.it><br>
> Date: Friday, May 31, 2024 at 5:36 AM<br>
> To: Christopher Keith <ckeith@jlab.org><br>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RGH meeting<br>
> <br>
> Ciao Chris,<br>
> I would like to restart the RGH meetings this coming Monday.<br>
> <br>
> As anticipated, I would like to come back to one of the<br>
> open questions that may arise during the PAC discussion.<br>
> Thia is about the orientation of the target magnet, and<br>
> the consequent sheet of flame (towards mid sector vs torus<br>
> coil).<br>
> <br>
> Would you be available to discuss the constraints from<br>
> the target point of view at the next meeting (this<br>
> Monday, June 3) ?<br>
> <br>
> Thanks, Marco.<br>
> <br>
> <br>
></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>