[clas12_rgk] [Clas12_first_exp] trigger efficiency vs ECal treshold
Andrea Celentano
andrea.celentano at ge.infn.it
Thu Dec 13 05:00:17 EST 2018
Dear all,
a follow-up: if I select events with the CD-track having an hit in both CTOF and CND-1, trigger efficiency is as follows:
(same color scheme as before).
This demonstrates trigger system is working properly: if a track as a hit in CTOF, the trigger bit 26 will see it. If a track as a hit in CTOF and in CND-1, trigger bit 26,27,28 will see it.
Andreas
> On Dec 13, 2018, at 10:43, Andrea Celentano <andrea.celentano at ge.infn.it> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
> the following is a first result concerning the CLAS12-CD trigger efficiency.
> Run was 5781, only trigger source enabled was FT in the energy range(300-8500) MeV
> I selected events with tracks in CLAS12-CD by looking at REC::Particle bank and selecting those with status>4000 and charge !=0
> I selected events with one and one only track in CLAS12-CD
> I kept only events with the track being associated to a CTOF hit (according to the event builder association).
> For these events, I look if the trigger bit n. 25 / 26 / 27 are set or not
> Trg bit 26 is CTOF only
> Trg bit 27 is CND only (layer 1)
> Trb bit 28 is CTOF*CND
> I expect trg bit 26 efficiency to be ~ 100% since the events I am using have the track hitting the CTOF, while trg bit 27 and 28 may have lower efficiency if the track doesn’t reach the CND (layer1)
>
> Attached plot show efficiency as a function of momentum - trg bit 26 is red, trg bit 27 is green, trg bit 27 is blue.
>
> As you see, Trg bit 26 efficiency is > 99% in full momentum range.
>
> I also attach a plot of theta vs phi for all tracks: there are holes in phi, is this normal?
>
>
> Andrea
>
>
>
> <PastedGraphic-2.png>
>
> ZOOM:
>
> <PastedGraphic-3.png>
>
> <PastedGraphic-4.png>
>
>
>> On Dec 13, 2018, at 05:04, Viktor Mokeev <mokeev at jlab.org <mailto:mokeev at jlab.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear FX,
>>
>> Anyway, I checked examples with the numerical results you mentioned in your e-mail. The check outcome is attached. My and your results coincide. So, we are on the same page. I just don't know how to read your nomogram. I was unable to get points from them in your examples...
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Victor
>> From: clas12_rgk <clas12_rgk-bounces at jlab.org <mailto:clas12_rgk-bounces at jlab.org>> on behalf of Viktor Mokeev <mokeev at jlab.org <mailto:mokeev at jlab.org>>
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 10:20:34 PM
>> To: Francois-Xavier Girod-Gard
>> Cc: Rafayel Paremuzyan; clas12 rgk; clas12 first exp
>> Subject: Re: [clas12_rgk] trigger efficiency vs ECal treshold
>>
>> Dear FX,
>>
>> I am not sure I understand your plots. We need to speak. I can do this tomorrow afternoon.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Victor
>>
>>
>> From: Francois-Xavier Girod <fxgirod at jlab.org <mailto:fxgirod at jlab.org>>
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 9:54:55 PM
>> To: Viktor Mokeev
>> Cc: clas12 rgk; clas12 first exp; Rafayel Paremuzyan
>> Subject: Re: [clas12_rgk] trigger efficiency vs ECal treshold
>>
>> Dear Viktor
>>
>> I have those series of over-informative plots as attached in case they can help the discussion
>> They show the kinematic coverage for a given beam energy
>>
>> Units are GeV and degrees. For instance, the points
>> ( Q^2 = 2 , W = 3 ) corresponds to approximately ( mom = 1.1 , theta = 30 )
>> ( Q^2 = 5 , W = 2.5 ) corresponds to approximately ( mom = 1 , theta = 53 ) (this point is off scale on the plots)
>> The 35 degree angle at W = 2.5 occurs around Q^2 = 3.8 and mom = 1.6
>>
>> Best regards
>> FX
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 6:26 PM Viktor Mokeev <mokeev at jlab.org <mailto:mokeev at jlab.org>> wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> From FX trigger efficiency plot, I see efficiency problems at the lab. energies of the scattered electron <2.0 GeV or for \nu value above 5.5 GeV for the electron beam energy 7.5 GeV. It corresponds to the following W ranges where we have the problem with trigger efficiency:
>>
>> Q^2=2.0 GeV^2 W>3.0 GeV
>> Q^2=5.0 GeV^2 W>2.5 GeV
>>
>> For hybrid baryon search, we have no any problem with the trigger efficiency at Q^2<2.0 GeV^2 since the lightest hybrids are expected in the mass range <2.5 GeV. Furthermore, the initial search for hybrid baryons will be carried out at Q^2<2.0 GeV^2.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Victor
>>
>> From: Francois-Xavier Girod <fxgirod at jlab.org <mailto:fxgirod at jlab.org>>
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 6:09:53 PM
>> To: Viktor Mokeev
>> Cc: clas12 rgk; clas12 first exp; Rafayel Paremuzyan
>> Subject: Re: [clas12_rgk] trigger efficiency vs ECal treshold
>>
>> Dear Viktor
>>
>> Rafo can confirmed as he produced the plot, my understanding is that the electron momentum is measured by the drift chambers
>>
>> Best regards
>> FX
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 6:08 PM Viktor Mokeev <mokeev at jlab.org <mailto:mokeev at jlab.org>> wrote:
>> Dear FX,
>>
>> Just to make sure, whether P on your plots is the energy=momentum of the scattered electron?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Victor
>> From: clas12_rgk <clas12_rgk-bounces at jlab.org <mailto:clas12_rgk-bounces at jlab.org>> on behalf of Francois-Xavier Girod <fxgirod at jlab.org <mailto:fxgirod at jlab.org>>
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 5:58:01 PM
>> To: clas12 rgk; clas12_first_exp at jlab.org <mailto:clas12_first_exp at jlab.org>
>> Cc: Rafayel Paremuzyan
>> Subject: [clas12_rgk] trigger efficiency vs ECal treshold
>>
>> Dear all
>>
>> During today's meeting I attempted to have a discussion on the trigger efficiency as function of ECal threshold. Contradicting statements were made during the meeting, so I want this discussion to be on record here.
>>
>> Please see the plot
>>
>> https://www.jlab.org/Hall-B/secure/clas12/rec_mon/P_Good_emWithEC_5786.png <https://www.jlab.org/Hall-B/secure/clas12/rec_mon/P_Good_emWithEC_5786.png>
>>
>> from Rafo's study of the trigger efficiency. He analyzed run 5786 which was taken with the random trigger.
>>
>> - in blue all "good electrons" with Nphe>2, E_PCal > 60 MeV, sampling fraction > 0.2 and fiducial cuts
>>
>> - in orange, the electrons satisfy in addition E_ECal > 300 MeV
>>
>> - in red, the events for which the orange set was missing the electron trigger bit
>>
>> The trigger efficiency is defined as (orange - red) / orange
>>
>> https://www.jlab.org/Hall-B/secure/clas12/rec_mon/Eff_All_Good_em_trg_threshold_5786.png <https://www.jlab.org/Hall-B/secure/clas12/rec_mon/Eff_All_Good_em_trg_threshold_5786.png>
>>
>> The trigger efficiency below 2 GeV drops rapidly, and measuring a cross section in this region is challenging
>>
>> My question during the meeting was: do we already have data to show the trigger efficiency when the threshold is 150 MeV. My understanding is that we do not have this data and that to answer this question we need to take another random trigger run with the lower threshold.
>>
>> What I have in mind is the following: I agree that the bulk of the RG-K data taking can take place at 300 MeV ECal trigger threshold and highest possible luminosity, but I would like to consider the possibility to take a few days at a lower trigger threshold to extend the cross section measurement to higher W. Again my purpose is to minimize the final systematic uncertainties.
>>
>> Best regards
>> FX
>> <FX_VM_check.pdf>_______________________________________________
>> Clas12_first_exp mailing list
>> Clas12_first_exp at jlab.org <mailto:Clas12_first_exp at jlab.org>
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_first_exp <https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_first_exp>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_rgk/attachments/20181213/29c4a8d8/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PastedGraphic-5.tiff
Type: image/tiff
Size: 949990 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_rgk/attachments/20181213/29c4a8d8/attachment-0001.tiff>
More information about the clas12_rgk
mailing list