[clas12_rgk] Fwd: impact of schedule change on RG-K

[Latifa Elouadrhiri]

Dear Annalisa,

Is this related to the email from Volker last week, we didn't hear from 
you on that email of request from RGK? Did you  make request of RGK on 
our behalf and how many  weeks did you request? where does one week come 
from?

Could you please give us more information on the running conditions beam 
energies?

Best regards,

Latifa



On 10/15/18 6:49 AM, Annalisa D'Angelo wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> the CCC is asking us about the impact on the physics of Run Group K if 
> we add one week of data taking in spring 2019 to the three weeks 
> (instead of four) now expected for 2018.
>
> They would like to know if we will have enough data to produce some 
> publication from the 2018 data (eventually including the additional 
> week in 2019).
>
> Please send me your comments and your opinion about the possibility of 
> an early publication from your proposed experiment.
>
> I will collect the information and write the draft for a response.
>
> Best regards
>
> Annalisa
>
>
>
> -------- Messaggio Inoltrato --------
> Oggetto: 	impact of schedule change on RG-K
> Data: 	Sun, 14 Oct 2018 22:48:04 -0400
> Mittente: 	Raffaella De Vita <Raffaella.Devita at ge.infn.it>
> A: 	Annalisa D'Angelo <annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it>
> CC: 	burkert <burkert at jlab.org>, Michael H Wood <wood5 at canisius.edu>, 
> Marco.Battaglieri <battaglieri at ge.infn.it>, Marco Contalbrigo 
> <mcontalb at fe.infn.it>
>
>
>
> Dear Annalisa,
> on Friday we had a CCC meeting to discuss the change in the accelerator schedule for 2018 and 2019.
> The discussion was specifically focussed on the 4 week extension that are being considered for the Spring 2019.
> The rational we have been following is to use this additional time to compensate for the losses that
> the different Run Groups will have for the delayed start of the machine after the summer shutdown
> and the other changes that are being done to the schedule. Among these, the extension of the 10.6 GeV
> running to after Thanksgiving and the consequent shortening of the low energy running at the end of
> this year are directly affecting Run Group. In this regard, what is being considered is to assign to
> Run Group K a week in the Spring 2019 after RG-B. To take a sound decision on this,
> we would like to have your feedback on the possibility for RG-K to have a publication from the 2018 run
> with the reduced time and on what would be the gain if another week of beam would be allocated in the Spring.
> Best regards,
> 	Raffaella
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> clas12_rgk mailing list
> clas12_rgk at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_rgk

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_rgk/attachments/20181015/94cd8b3b/attachment.html>