[clas12_rgk] Selected RGK runs for calibration

[Latifa Elouadrhiri]

Dear Raffaella,

For RGK we should proceed with 6b.2.0 in preparation for the near term 
milestones. Nikck please proceed with data processing of the selected 
RGK runs.

For the CLAS12 First experiment I have no feeling how much new 
calibration based  6b.2.0 will improve the physics? it will take us at 
least another week to converge on new calibration constants? should we 
just process the data processing based on the calibrations from last 
week? and what version of the release we should use?

Best regards,

Latifa

On 5/27/19 4:19 PM, Raffaella De Vita wrote:
> Dear Latifa,
> That will take a few days for testing and will require a new release. Therefore I would not recommend to wait for that to proceed with the calibrations.
> Best regards,
> 	Raffaella
>
>> On 27 May 2019, at 22:16, Latifa Elouadrhiri <latifa at jlab.org> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Raffaella,
>>
>> What do you think is need to test the vertex correction? I would like to wait for that to redo the calibration, if it is not too long?
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Latifa
>>
>>
>> On 5/27/19 4:06 PM, markov wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>> Should we cook the full runs 5038/5036 with the new 6b.2.0 and distribute around for all the subsystems to calibrate?
>>> Nick.
>>>> On May 27, 2019, at 4:05 PM, Raffaella De Vita <devita at jlab.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <20190527_vertex.pdf>