[clas12_rgk] GEMC MM resolutions

[mdefurne]

Hi Dan,

Why is this e-mail entitled GEMC MM resolutions? I do not understand the 
link between the title and the content about DC.

Kind regards,

Maxime

On 09/09/2019 15:35, Daniel Carman wrote:
> Folks,
>
> At our last RG-K meeting on Friday, Volker asked about the DC position 
> resolution function. I
> spoke with Mauri this morning and he indicated that the position 
> smearing in the simulation
> matches the current calibration data. The fact that the missing mass 
> resolution shown by
> Evgeny in the two-pion channel are much better in simulation compared 
> to data is therefore
> due to other smearing factors such as magnetic field and alignment. 
> Let me know if you have
> any questions.
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
>
> ***********************************************************************************
> **
> * Dr. Daniel S. Carmane-mail : carman at jlab.org <mailto:carman at jlab.org>*
> * Staff Scientistoffice : (757)-269-5586*
> * Jefferson Laboratoryweb:http://userweb.jlab.org/~carman  *
> **
> ***********************************************************************************
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> clas12_rgk mailing list
> clas12_rgk at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_rgk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_rgk/attachments/20190909/756431f8/attachment-0001.html>