[clas12_rgk] [EXTERNAL] Re: DNP Analyses

[Annalisa D'Angelo]

Dear Bryan,
We will be happy to discuss any results that will be presented at the DNP meeting from rgk at the weekly meeting.
We are still in the process of starting pass1, so time is running short 
We will keep the HSWG informed on progresses.


Prof.ssa Annalisa D'Angelo
Dip Fisica Università di Roma Tor Vergata e INFN Roma Tor Vergata
Jefferson Lab


> Il giorno 16 set 2019, alle ore 17:43, Bryan McKinnon <Bryan.McKinnon at glasgow.ac.uk> ha scritto:
> 
> Dear RG contact persons
> 
> Similarly to Marco, I have been looking at formalising HSWG approval for 
> upcoming DNP presentations.
> According to the list, there are 4 CLAS12 HSWG associated talks:
> Nick Markov
> Daniel Carman
> Marco Battaglieri
> Isabella Illari
> 
> (and 2 CLAS6 talks)
> 
> The idea allocating time during the usual RG meeting slots, following 
> Marco's proposed time-line, seems sensible to me. I know that Marco B 
> previously devoted HSWG meetings for this, but if it can be accounted 
> for within RG meetings, then I am all for it.
> 
> Regards
> Bryan
> 
> 
> 
>> On 16/09/2019 15:11, Marco Contalbrigo wrote:
>> Dear RG contact persons and RGH chair,
>> I would be glad to coordinate with you the formal steps
>> towards the release of DPWG results for DNP.
>> 
>> Below is the mail I sent to the DNP speakers some time
>> ago, ancticipating the request of a brief release note,
>> a WG approval and a dry run in preparation of the
>> Conference.
>> 
>> Given the short time left, I would assume the usual RG
>> meeting time slots could be allocate for (part of) the
>> above procedures (presentations and discussions).
>> 
>> As DNP dates are October 14-17, I would propose we
>> reserve days 1-2-3-4  for analysis approval, and
>> the week after for dry-runs.
>> 
>> I would like to circulate those dates in order that the
>> speakers could properly plan their work.
>> 
>> Please let me know your opinion.
>> 
>> Thnaks, Marco.
>> 
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 14:36:01 +0200 (CEST)
>> From: Marco Contalbrigo <mcontalb at fe.infn.it>
>> To: DNP abstracts -- Andrey Kim <kenjo at jlab.org>,
>>     Angela Biselli <abiselli at fairfield.edu>,
>>     Brandon Clary <brandon.clary at uconn.edu>,
>>     Christopher Dilks <christopher.j.dilks at gmail.com>,
>>     "Diehl, Stefan" <stefan.diehl at uconn.edu>,
>>     Giovanni Angelini <gangel at gwu.edu>, guillaum at jlab.org,
>>     Harout Avagyan <avakian at jlab.org>, joshtanj at jlab.org,
>>     Kitty Price <kprice at jlab.org>, Stefan Diehl <sdiehl at jlab.org>,
>>     Timothy Hayward <tbhayward at email.wm.edu>
>> Subject: DNP Analysis
>> 
>> Dear all,
>> let me remind that only two months are left before the DNP
>> meeting in fall and time is running fast. Any DNP
>> presentation would eventually need:
>> - a (brief) release note presenting what has been done;
>> - a preentation for approval at one of the DPANA meetings;
>> - a rehearsal (dry-run) before the Conference.
>> 
>> The Collaboration goal at DNP is to present advanced analyses
>> to deomstrate real progresses with respect the very preliminary
>> results of last year. For example, multidimensional binning and
>> systematic uncertainty evaluation would be recommended.
>> 
>> You are encouraged to regularly report at the DPANA meetings
>> on Thursday the status of your analysis. This would provide
>> an occasion to get suggestions for supported approaches and
>> faster final approval.
>> 
>> I would suggest you to have a look at the calendar and
>> anticipate to me a couple of tentative slots at your convenience
>> when you would be ready to provide a status report, e.g. one
>> in August, one in September. Christopher will initiate his
>> cycle this week.
>> 
>> As you know, Stefan, Aram and Efrain, with the help of
>> FX, are working on the fiducial volume selections.
>> 
>> You are encouraged to organize cross-checks of the results
>> between independent analyzers looking at the
>> same data-sets. This apply essentially to the main
>> results and is meant to favor the sharing of
>> knowledge in data processing and the self-confidence
>> in the outcomes. From my point of view, there is no need
>> to cross-check the systematic evaluation or derivated
>> secondary quantities.
>> 
>> Good work, Marco.
> 
> -- 
> ___________________________________
> 
> Dr. Bryan McKinnon
> 
> Nuclear and Hadron Physics Research
> School of Physics and Astronomy
> University of Glasgow
> Glasgow
> G12 8QQ
> Scotland UK
> 
> Tel: (+44/0) 141-330-7226
> ___________________________________
>