[clas12_rgk] [EXTERNAL] Reminder: RG-K meeting tomorrow at 8:00 Jlab time

[Nikolay Markov]

I do not think this schedule is absolutely rigid, I have an understanding they can give us a day or two for tests.
P.S. right now we are running in parallel with RGB, as per plan, so we can not expect to have 100% of the fairshare.
We can certainly discuss it tomorrow morning.
Nick.
________________________________
From: Francois-Xavier Girod <fxgirod at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 8:12 PM
To: Nikolay Markov <markov at jlab.org>
Cc: clas12 rgk <clas12_rgk at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: [clas12_rgk] [EXTERNAL] Reminder: RG-K meeting tomorrow at 8:00 Jlab time

Yes there seems to be a problem with this particular wagon, at least at first glance

I think trains were supposed to be run often, at least on as a matter of principle. The particular wagon we are talking about here concerns the selection of exclusive omega production, which is not even an approved experiment. I think it would make little sense to delay cooking for this. We were given 7 days to start RGK cooking by itself before going to parallel cooking. Waiting 2 days out of one week is not small. I think we were approved for production and we should be in production mode.

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 2:03 AM Nikolay Markov <markov at jlab.org<mailto:markov at jlab.org>> wrote:
I am not really sure, we can discuss it.
If we can spend a day or two and have all wagons correct I'd do it.
Otherwise, we can go ahead and do wagons on the  second pass.
Is this a problematic one:
DVPipPimPi0PWagon.java<https://github.com/markovnick/grapes/blob/master/src/main/java/org/jlab/jnp/grapes/services/DVPipPimPi0PWagon.java>?
Nick.
________________________________
From: Francois-Xavier Girod <fxgirod at jlab.org<mailto:fxgirod at jlab.org>>
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 8:00 PM
To: Nikolay Markov <markov at jlab.org<mailto:markov at jlab.org>>
Cc: clas12 rgk <clas12_rgk at jlab.org<mailto:clas12_rgk at jlab.org>>
Subject: Re: [clas12_rgk] [EXTERNAL] Reminder: RG-K meeting tomorrow at 8:00 Jlab time

By the way do we need to stop cooking to fix trains?
This seems contrary to the point of trains

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 1:31 AM Nikolay Markov <markov at jlab.org<mailto:markov at jlab.org>> wrote:
Dear all,
We have started cooking on Tuesday.
Two 7.5 GeV (5700, 5865) runs are finished (including trains in the latest configuration):
/volatile/clas12/rg-k/production/recon/fall2018/torus+1/7546MeV/pass1/v0/dst/recon/
I want to ask people who do analysis to check train output and if everything is fine I will go ahead with the rest of the 7.5 GeV dataset.
Nick.
________________________________
From: clas12_rgk <clas12_rgk-bounces at jlab.org<mailto:clas12_rgk-bounces at jlab.org>> on behalf of Francois-Xavier Girod <fxgirod at jlab.org<mailto:fxgirod at jlab.org>>
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 5:53 PM
To: clas12 rgk <clas12_rgk at jlab.org<mailto:clas12_rgk at jlab.org>>
Subject: Re: [clas12_rgk] [EXTERNAL] Reminder: RG-K meeting tomorrow at 8:00 Jlab time

Dear all

>From what I understood we were supposed to start cooking on Monday
Is that correct?

At the moment I can only find the dst for run 5700 created today around noon
I suppose this is due to the time for production to ramp up

Maybe we can discuss briefly the status of the cooking
We should have monitoring for this run started (?)

Best regards
FX
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_rgk/attachments/20200724/85b7dd76/attachment.html>