[clas12_rgk] [EXTERNAL] New version of the letter for RG-K pass1 request to CCC

burkert burkert at jlab.org
Sun Mar 1 19:31:25 EST 2020


Victor,
    That sounds fine, either way.
V.

On 3/1/20 5:30 PM, Viktor Mokeev wrote:
> Hi Volker,
>
> I propose either keep the sentence as is or :
>
> They also have strong connections to proposals that have already been 
> approved as part of the CLAS12 RG-A physics program and will very 
> significantly extend the science reach of those experiments, while at 
> the same time presenting new avenues towards clarifying the degrees of 
> freedom active in the excitation of baryons and providing new insight 
> into the so far unresolved problem of understanding the confinement of 
> light quarks*/from the baryon structure exploration /*
>
> Best Regards,
>                             Victor
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* burkert <burkert at jlab.org>
> *Sent:* Sunday, March 1, 2020 5:19 PM
> *To:* Viktor Mokeev <mokeev at jlab.org>; clas12_rgk at jlab.org 
> <clas12_rgk at jlab.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [clas12_rgk] [EXTERNAL] New version of the letter for 
> RG-K pass1 request to CCC
> Victor,
>  We are talking here about a request to the CCC not a proposal to the 
> PAC or a publication. We should just stick to what ever we had given 
> in the approved proposal as very short justification. Moreover, the 
> sentence becomes too long and convoluted; it refers twice to excited 
> baryons/nucleons in the same sentence.
>
> This is the sentence with your addition:
>
> "They also have strong connections to proposals that have already been 
> approved as part of the CLAS12 RG-A physics program and will very 
> significantly extend the science reach of those experiments, while at 
> the same time presenting new avenues towards clarifying the degrees of 
> freedom active in the excitation of baryons and providing new insight 
> into the so far unresolved problem of understanding the confinement of 
> light quarks*/from the exploration of many facets of the strong QCD 
> relevant for the excited nucleons of distinctively different 
> structures."/*
>
>
>
> Volker
>
>
> On 3/1/20 3:17 PM, Viktor Mokeev wrote:
>> Hi Volker,
>>
>>  In addition. The confinement is encoded in the presence of the 
>> inflection point in the momentum dependence of dressed quark mass. 
>> Credible access to the dressed quark mass function from the data will 
>> be justified if we will describe elastic nucleon ff and 
>> electrocouplings of different N* states with the SAME dressed quark 
>> mass function. Validation of the momentum dependence of dressed quark 
>> mass from combined studies of  the ground nucleon elastic ff and 
>> different gvpN* electroexcitation amplitudes, therefore, will open 
>> accesses to the presence/location of the inflection point or to the 
>> quark-gluon confinement.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>                           Victor
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* clas12_rgk <clas12_rgk-bounces at jlab.org> 
>> <mailto:clas12_rgk-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf of Viktor Mokeev 
>> <mokeev at jlab.org> <mailto:mokeev at jlab.org>
>> *Sent:* Sunday, March 1, 2020 3:05 PM
>> *To:* Volker Burkert <burkert at jlab.org> <mailto:burkert at jlab.org>; 
>> clas12_rgk at jlab.org <mailto:clas12_rgk at jlab.org> 
>> <clas12_rgk at jlab.org> <mailto:clas12_rgk at jlab.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: [clas12_rgk] [EXTERNAL] New version of the letter for 
>> RG-K pass1 request to CCC
>> Hi Volker,
>>
>> I want to justify why the excited nucleon states offer new insight 
>> into the light quark confinement. It is because they are the only 
>> source of the information on many facets of strong QCD underlying the 
>> confinement which can be seen in the generation of different 
>> structural features of different excited nucleon states.
>>
>>  Best Regards,
>>                                     Victor
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* clas12_rgk <clas12_rgk-bounces at jlab.org> 
>> <mailto:clas12_rgk-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf of burkert 
>> <burkert at jlab.org> <mailto:burkert at jlab.org>
>> *Sent:* Sunday, March 1, 2020 2:34 PM
>> *To:* clas12_rgk at jlab.org <mailto:clas12_rgk at jlab.org> 
>> <clas12_rgk at jlab.org> <mailto:clas12_rgk at jlab.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: [clas12_rgk] [EXTERNAL] New version of the letter for 
>> RG-K pass1 request to CCC
>> Victor,
>>   Not sure I understand that additional text. The excited baryons are 
>> already prominently referred to in the original text:
>>
>> "... while at the same time presenting new avenues towards clarifying 
>> the degrees of freedom active in the excitation of baryons and 
>> providing new insight into the so far unresolved problem of 
>> understanding the confinement of light quarks. "
>>
>>
>> Volker
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/1/20 1:24 PM, Viktor Mokeev wrote:
>>> Hi Annalisa.
>>>
>>> Just a single proposed edit:
>>>
>>> new insight into the so far unresolved problem of understanding the 
>>> confinement of light quarks--->
>>> new insight into the so far unresolved problem of understanding the 
>>> confinement of light quarks from the exploration of many facets of 
>>> the strong QCD relevant for the excited nucleons of distinctively 
>>> different structures.
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> *From:* clas12_rgk <clas12_rgk-bounces at jlab.org> 
>>> <mailto:clas12_rgk-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf of Annalisa D'Angelo 
>>> <annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it> <mailto:annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it>
>>> *Sent:* Sunday, March 1, 2020 11:05 AM
>>> *To:* clas12_rgk at jlab.org <mailto:clas12_rgk at jlab.org> 
>>> <clas12_rgk at jlab.org> <mailto:clas12_rgk at jlab.org>; Latifa 
>>> Elouadrhiri <latifa at jlab.org> <mailto:latifa at jlab.org>; nick markov 
>>> <markov at jlab.org> <mailto:markov at jlab.org>
>>> *Subject:* [clas12_rgk] [EXTERNAL] New version of the letter for 
>>> RG-K pass1 request to CCC
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> please find in attachment the updated version of the letter for RG-K
>>> pass1 request to be submitted to CCC.
>>>
>>> It takes into account the result of the discussion form the last RG-K
>>> meeting.
>>>
>>> Please send me your comments by next Wednesday March 4th , so we may
>>> send it to the CCC by the end of next week.
>>>
>>> All the best
>>>
>>> Annalisa
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> ================================================
>>> Prof. Annalisa D'Angelo
>>> Dip. Fisica, Universita' di Roma "Tor Vergata"
>>> Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
>>> Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome Italy
>>> email:annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it 
>>> <mailto:email:annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it>
>>> Jefferson Laboratory, Newport News, VA USA
>>> Email: annalisa at jlab.org <mailto:annalisa at jlab.org>
>>> Tel: + 39 06 72594562
>>>
>>>
>>> This body part will be downloaded on demand.
>>
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_rgk/attachments/20200301/20602f2a/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the clas12_rgk mailing list