[clas12_rgk] [EXTERNAL] Re: Internal jeopardy review for PAC48 - RG-K document

[Dave Ireland]

Hi Annalisa,

Thanks for sending the draft RG-K jeopardy document. We will aim to get 
our comments on it back to you by next week. We may also find that a 
follow-up call might be helpful to move things along quickly.

Cheers,

Dave




On 26/05/2020 10:55, Annalisa D'Angelo wrote:
> To the Chair of the CLAS Internal Review Committee - Prof. David Ireland
> 
> To the Chair of the CLAS Collaboration - Prof. Kyungseon Joo
> 
> please find in attachment the Initial draft of the document we are 
> preparing for the PAC48  Jeopardy Review Committee. The document 
> reflects the present status of the preliminary analysis of the available 
> RG-K fall 2018 data. We expect to improve some of the figures, such as 
> Figure 3, in the next weeks, possibly refining the statistics and the 
> fit quality.
> 
> We are also preparing additional material, dedicated to a more detailed 
> description of the data analysis procedure, which is posted on a 
> dedicated web RG-K wiki page, which is available at the link:
> 
> All the material, including the attached document is available on the , 
> at the link:
> 
> https://clasweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/Run_Group_K#tab=Jeopardy_Document
> 
> Please note that the present list of authors is limited to the list of 
> PI and dedicated students and post-doc. We are planning to circulate the 
> document among the original list authors to verify that the scientific 
> interest of the scientists and the institutes they belong to is still 
> vivid.
> 
> We will be pleased to promptly address all your inputs to improve the 
> quality of the scope of the document.
> 
> Thank you for your attention and support
> 
> Annalisa D'Angelo
> 
> for the RG-K
>