[clas12_rgk] Possible RG-K run in FY27

[Annalisa D'Angelo]

Dear Stepan,

We have discussed your proposal within the RG-K group and we all think 
it would be great to take data for RG-K in FY27. We are ready to 
increase and eventually complete our assigned PAC days.

We have also learned that in FY27 Hall A is expected to run the MOLLER 
experiment (possibly starting in the second half of the beam period), 
which requires very high beam polarization with high-rate polarization 
change. This may have an impact on the magnitude of the polarization 
possible in Hall B (and, possibly, on the correct reconstruction of the 
beam polarization in our DAQ).

Since we understand that RG-E is not sensitive to the beam polarization, 
it would beneficial for us to run in the first half of the beam before 
before MOLLER so we can ensure that we maximize the RG-K beam polarization.

Thank you for this opportunity

All the best

Annalisa


Il 11/11/25 22:25, Stepan Stepanyan ha scritto:
> Dear Annalisa,
>
> I’m putting together a tentative run schedule for after the FY26 PRad 
> run. One likely scenario for FY27 is running RG-E and RG-K. I’d like 
> to get the run groups’ views on whether you are ready and willing to 
> proceed, or if you would prefer additional time to analyze the 
> existing data before the next run. If you can get back to me before 
> next Tuesday, that would be great.
>
> Thanks,
> Stepan

-- 
================================================
Prof. Annalisa D'Angelo
Dip. Fisica, Universita' di Roma "Tor Vergata"
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome Italy
email:annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it 
Jefferson Laboratory, Newport News, VA USA
Email:annalisa at jlab.org
Tel: + 39 06 72594562
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_rgk/attachments/20251118/0436c1a7/attachment.htm>