<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">All,<br>
<br>
I agree with intention of the text. However, I suggest to downplay
the 6.5 vs 6.4 GeV. I don't think it is such a big deal and we
have to deal with that later again as the machine energy will
never be exactly the same as in previous run periods. We have to
learn how to deal with slight energy variations in an effective
way. <br>
<br>
Typo: In the next to last paragraph please delete the first
"during" in the string "
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:auto;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:3 0 0 0 1 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:Cambria;
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:auto;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:3 0 0 0 1 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{mso-style-parent:"";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:"ＭＳ 明朝";
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;
mso-ansi-language:IT;
mso-fareast-language:IT;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;
mso-header-margin:.5in;
mso-footer-margin:.5in;
mso-paper-source:0;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
--> </style><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:major-latin;mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New
Roman";
mso-hansi-theme-font:major-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New
Roman";
mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:IT"> during as soon
as possible
during the November RG..</span>
<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Volker<br>
<br>
<br>
On 10/25/18 7:41 AM, Annalisa D'Angelo wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:0fcff64d-3a87-7610-432f-0858d6b3710d@roma2.infn.it">Dear
All,
<br>
<br>
after last RGK meeting, some additional thinking and exchange of
information with Raffaella, I have put together a draft letter to
answer the CCC request information, which you may find at:
<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://userweb.jlab.org/~annalisa/hybrid_baryons/RGK_response_to_CCC.docx">https://userweb.jlab.org/~annalisa/hybrid_baryons/RGK_response_to_CCC.docx</a>
<br>
<br>
In a nut shell I would like to propose that the new trigger
requiring a central hadron could be implemented and commissioned
as soon as possible during RGA, not to loose time during our
assigned RGK data taking. RGA could take all the Spring data
taking in return.
<br>
<br>
This would optimize the overall efficiency.
<br>
<br>
Please let me know your opinion on the matter.
<br>
<br>
Any comment/correction/suggestion is highly appreciated
<br>
<br>
All the best
<br>
<br>
Annalisa
<br>
<br>
p.s. we may discuss the matter tomorrow at the RGK weekly
meeting.
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>