<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Annalisa</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">I thought you said to send the comments
to Marco by Friday evening. <br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">So, may comments that I just sent to
you didn't make it in time. <br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Why did you rush it? <br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Volker</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/6/19 3:11 PM, Annalisa D'Angelo
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:20c9c329-c4be-0dd7-01d2-460f124380ae@roma2.infn.it">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<p>Dear Marco,</p>
<p>please find the requested summary for RGK in attachment.</p>
<p>All the best</p>
<p>Annalisa<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Il 05/09/19 11:29, Marco Battaglieri
ha scritto:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:b30282f6-427f-4558-c295-64af4085a218@ge.infn.it"> ...
just a gentle reminder<br>
cheers<br>
Marco<br>
<br>
<br>
Dear CLAS12 Run Groups (RG) contact-persons,<br>
as you probably know, I'm taking the Hall-B leadership starting
from mid September and one of the first topic I will be asked to
discuss with the Physics Division is the Hall-B scheduling for
next years.<br>
While the scheduling for FY20 (see Rolf's message at the
beginning of August) is almost firm (the official rescheduling
will be available soon), a proposal for FY21 and FY22 should be
presented early this fall.<br>
The scheduling is a quite complicated process that requires to
take into account many factors that include: PAC scientific
rating, technical issues, readiness of the experiments,
compatibility with other halls requests, ... and especially
(your) capability of putting together as many experiments as
possible with the same run condition in order to get the best
for the CLAS12 Collaboration out of every single day of run.<br>
<br>
I think this is a good time to start a discussion with you (and
within the RG you represent), collecting information useful for
an efficient and agreed schedule for the future years. <br>
<br>
I'd like to have from each of you <b>a short document (max 4
pages)</b> reporting:<br>
- <b>the list of exps</b> you represent (including spokesperson
names);<br>
- <b>key-words/highlights</b> about the physics program of your
RG (very short);<br>
- the number of <b>allocated PAC days</b>;<br>
- the number of <b>days already run</b> (if any);<br>
- <b>run conditions</b> (for the remaining part) in two
scenarios (optimal/minimal) to accomplish the physics program
(or a significant fraction) of your physics program;<br>
- any other RG/experiment that, at your knowledge, may <b>share
the same run conditions</b> of your RG;<br>
- a detailed list of <b>non-standard equipment</b> (something
more/different than current CLAS12 set up) or specific needs of
your RG;<br>
- the <b>readiness of your experiment</b> (equipment- and
DAQ/trigger-wise) including the ERR conclusions/recommendations
(if any);<br>
- <b>best arguments</b> to motivate the allocation for FY21 and
FY22 of a certain <b>fraction</b> of the full PAC run-time
considering two possible scenarios (optimal/minimal);<br>
- any <b>known issues/difficulties</b> related to your run
conditions where the Lab could help with;<br>
- any short<b> on-beam tests</b> could be useful to asses the
experiment readiness and the capability to run at the desired
condition (e.g. of luminosity).<br>
<br>
Please provide the most possible accurate and sincere
information in order to define CLAS12 RG needs and readiness:
this is just one piece of the whole picture and I need to have
it as clear as possible to defend Hall-B (our!) interests in
front of JLab management.<br>
<br>
Let me stress that we are a Collaboration and our strength
resides not only in our-own preferred experiment but especially
in our capability in taking advantage of all other CLAS12 runs
to shape the physics program we are interested in. Understanding
reasons of other RGs and acting as a whole, is the only way to
make CLAS12 physics program bigger than the algebraic sum of the
different experiments!<br>
<br>
I'd appreciate if you could draft and send me the document <b>by
Friday September 6th</b>.<br>
Thanks in advance<br>
Marco<br>
<br>
ps here below is the most updated list of RG representatives I
got from PhysDiv.<br>
Let me know if anything is changed in your RG<br>
RG-A: L.Elouadrhirs
<div>RG-B: S.Niccolai</div>
<div>RG-C: S.Khun </div>
<div>RG-D: L. El Fassi</div>
<div>RG-E: W.Brooks </div>
<div>RG-F: S. Khun </div>
RG-G: W.Brooks
<div>RG-H: <span class="">M.Contalbrigo</span></div>
<div>RG-K: <span class="">A. D’Angelo</span></div>
<div>RG-L: R.Dupre </div>
<div>RG-M: L. Weinstein<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
================================================
Prof. Annalisa D'Angelo
Dip. Fisica, Universita' di Roma "Tor Vergata"
INFN Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome Italy
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:email:annalisa.dangelo@roma2.infn.it" moz-do-not-send="true">email:annalisa.dangelo@roma2.infn.it</a>
Jefferson Laboratory, Newport News, VA USA
Email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:annalisa@jlab.org" moz-do-not-send="true">annalisa@jlab.org</a>
Tel: + 39 06 72594562
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">This body part will be downloaded on demand.</pre>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>