<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-15">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Dear Annalisa,</p>
<p>Today Volker and I will not be able to attend RGK as we are at
BNL for an EIC meeting.</p>
<p><u><b>Status update and answer to your questions</b></u>:<br>
</p>
<p><b>Here is the update: </b>We have a good calibration for for
run 5700 for 7.5 GeV and 5893 for 6.5 GeV is being calibrated, and
pass0 is in progress. Final release expected this weekend.<br>
</p>
<p><u><b>Your questions</b></u><br>
</p>
<p>The plan is to do the same quality checks for RGK for helicity
and detector performance, if there is any additional help needed
for RGK we will let you know, for now Christopher and Andrey are
finalizing the framework and the criteria.<br>
</p>
<p>Yes, the plan is to have quality check/histo based on what FX has
been doing. Andrey is doing something similar. The plan is to
coordinate the effort and produce final list of monitoring
histograms to produce per run that are necessary and sufficient to
check the quality of the data/run. We will organize them in a
given directory, and check reference run for each
configuration/calibration changes in the logbook.</p>
<p>This week we will have the final release for pass1, Raffaella has
shown last Wednesday indications for potential good improvement
with the new CVT tracking. Very good news. We will have more
details once we cook the data with the new release which is
expected this weekend for one run from RGK and one run from RGA.<br>
</p>
<p>Please send any additional feedback that we can incorporate as we
are in full preparation of pass1 review for RGA. Anything we do
for RGA would be helpful for RGK pass1 review.<br>
</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>Latifa<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 1/31/20 6:28 AM, Annalisa D'Angelo
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:51665bfd-1ed4-b82b-a28f-ac48698cec3f@roma2.infn.it">Dear
Latifa,
<br>
<br>
I have looked into Christopher Dilks' slides and timelines for
quality monitoring of electron trigger and helicity quality
assurance and found them very important. Is there any plan to
continue this work also for RGK?
<br>
<br>
Are there other quality checks, that you plan to implement?
<br>
<br>
I was looking back at some kinematical plots for the runs produced
by FX last year:
<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3638886">https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3638886</a>
<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3546138">https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3546138</a>
<br>
<br>
Would it be possible to produce similar selected quality plots for
each run at some stage of timeline or cooking production?
<br>
<br>
All the best
<br>
<br>
Annalisa
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>