[Clas12_rich] Fwd: Re: May 23th Meeting Minutes
Marco Mirazita
Marco.Mirazita at lnf.infn.it
Mon Jun 6 13:09:38 EDT 2016
Dear Saptarshi,
George sent to you the updated drawings of the RICH cooling and N2 gas
systems, from the sources up to the panels just before the RICH.
Here I want to add some information on the circuits from the panels and
inside the RICH, in order to allow you to fully review the systems and
to be able to approve by June 10.
Cooling system
We have 1 inch tubes in the system, from the compressors to the panel.
From the panel, each tube serving one RICH module is split in two, I
don't have the map of Hall-B but I guess their length should be
something like 10 or 20 m.
The air is sent inside the RICH through two rilsan tubes (one per side
of the RICH) with 8 mm diameter. They run inside the RICH from the top
panel to the electronics (see the pictures) for about 4 m.
The exhaust air is removed by 6 large tubes, 30 mm diameter.
The system includes two compressors with max capacity of 1200 l/min, to
be able, in case of failure of one compressor, to serve both modules
with the other.
The maximum pressure in the tank is about 8 bar.
The operating point is to have 150 l/min of air per side (300 l/min per
module).
The system George designed is dimensioned to sustain the max. flow the
compressors could supply, even if it is much higher than what we need
and we will never run at this high flow rate.
Nitrogen
Again, we have 1 inch tubes from the N2 source to the panel.
The gas inlet is on one side of the RICH, the outlet is on the other
side.
Again, we need to split the 1 inch main tube to the 5 inlet rilsan
tubes, with variable length between about 1 and 4 m, that run inside the
RICH.
The outlet is made by 2 large tubes, 30 mm diameter.
The working condition is to have one refill per day, which means 3.5
l/min, with a maximum overpressure inside the RICH of 0.5 mbar.
Best regards,
Marco
-------- Messaggio originale --------
Oggetto: Re: [Clas12_rich] May 23th Meeting Minutes
Data: 2016-06-03 21:09
Mittente: George Jacobs <jacobsg at jlab.org>
Destinatario: Marco Mirazita <Marco.Mirazita at lnf.infn.it>, Bob Miller
<rmiller at jlab.org>, Saptarshi Mandal <mandal at jlab.org>
Cc: Marco Contalbrigo <mcontalb at fe.infn.it>, rossi patrizia
<rossi at jlab.org>, clas12 rich <clas12_rich at jlab.org>
Hi Marco,
I will answer the questions I can. But, your design of the detector
internal cooling should be approved by Hall B and JLAB engineers. Same
with the details of your external piping and cable connection locations.
For 1.1, 1.2, and 2.0 you should direct your questions to Bob Miller and
Saptarshi Mandal about your plan to use a 4 meter long 8mm OD tube to
flow 150-300 slm air. FYI, the smaller the tube ID and the longer the
tube length, the higher the pressure required to flow X liters of gas.
Larger ID gas lines and/or a greater number of lines will flow X liters
of gas at a lower differential pressure.
Hall B engineer must approve the physical locations of the air and N2
input and output line connections. I am unfamiliar with your detector
design, but I am pretty sure all connections must be at the back plate.
Not sure what you mean by the top of the detector. Bob Miller can
explain the exact physical constraints.
Please find that I have attached 4 diagrams. 2 for the air cooling
circuit and 2 for the N2 purge. Please take a close look at the flow
paths, components, and connections. Perhaps these diagrams will answer
many of your questions. Perhaps a meeting should be scheduled where
these diagrams can be discussed at length? But, not a phone meeting.
Your questions;
1)------------------
MM question- Why having an interlock shutting down the N2 line in case
of problems is not required and will have the opposite effects?
GJ response- What exact purpose or problem would be solved by adding an
automatic shut off valve for stopping the N2 flow? What danger or hazard
is mitigated? What parameter is to be monitored for the interlock?
Any powered shut off valve would close in the event of a power outage.
That would shut off N2 flow to the detector. Long term power outages are
associated with storms such as hurricanes and other rain events with
wind and flooding. During these events humidity in the hall will
increase to 100%. In the case of power outage the shut off valve will
stop the N2 gas purge. This will allow H2O into the RICH.
In my current design, see the attached diagram, the N2 purge flow does
not stop during a power outage. The N2 purge continues preventing H2O
from entering the RICH.
2)------------------
MM question - From our side, we would like to have also humidity sensors
in the system, may you add this sensors to your design?
GJ response - I can add H2O sensor to the N2 supply if you want one. Is
there any particular location you want it at? Or would you prefer it on
the outlet to measure the H2O in the N2 exhaust gas?
3)--------------
MM question - Is the system design we have now able to supply the
nitrogen to two RICH module or just to one?
GJ response - Please look closely at the supplied diagrams for the N2
controls and N2 Valve panel. You will see that there are 2 identical gas
supplies, one each for the two RICH detectors. The diagrams name them as
RICH #1 and RICH #2.
4)----------------
MM question - What is the nitrogen quality?
GJ response - Nitrogen quality is 99.998 % pure. That leaves 20 ppm of
other stuff. According to the vendor, it will always be <3 ppm H20. If
this quality is less than required, we will need to use ultra high
purity N2 from high pressure gas cylinders using new dedicated gas
supply lines that run from outside the hall to the fwd carriage location
of the RICH gas panel. This would increase the daily cost of the N2
purge gas significantly.
Cheers,
George
On 6/3/2016 8:38 AM, Marco Mirazita wrote:
> Hi George,
> in the last days I was busy with the dry run of the ERR presentations
> and I didn't have much time to follow the discussions regarding the
> RICH
> gas systems. I realized now that the numbers that are circulating might
> be not the right ones.
> It is my fault and I apologize for that.
> I would make here a summary of the present status of the two systems,
> as far as I understood till now.
> If there no objections from your side, I consider the numbers that I'm
> quoting here as the ones for which we should ask for approval to Bob
> and Saptarshi.
> We will have time when the RICH will be ready for testing to refine the
> parameter of the systems.
>
> 1) Cooling system
>
> 1.1) Tests in Frascati
> We used a mockup of half of the electronic package, heat load 200 W,
> cooling system with air flow 100 l/min, air temperature 20 C.
> We sent the air flow inside the module using one rilsan tube with 8 mm
> external diameter, with a series of small diameter (~1 mm) holes.
> The tube must be not too big diameter to avoid heating of the air
> inside it.
> The holes must be small, to have sufficient velocity of the air to
> efficiently cool down the whole volume.
> Our gas system was made by a compressor, then a manometer to adjust the
> air flux and a fluximeter.
> With 100 l/min of air flow, the pressure at the manometer was 0.6 atm.
> Just for test, we run also with 200 l/min flow and the pressure was
> 1.35 atm.
>
> 1.2) Cooling system of the RICH
> We expect a heat load of 500 W. From the Frascati tests and having some
> safety factor, we will need for cooling 300 l/min.
> We will send the cooling air inside the RICH using two 8 mm diameter
> tubes, one per each side of the RICH module.
> Thus, comparing to the Frascati data, we roughly will have 3 times more
> air flow but also two tubes instead of one.
> As a non expert, I guess we should expect on each side of the RICH
> cooling system ends a pressure not much bigger than what we had in
> Frascati.
> Please correct me if I'm wrong on this point.
> The exaust will be removed with 6 large diameter tubes.
>
> The maximum capacity of the two compressors has been chosen so that, in
> case of failure of one of the two, the other will be able to supply the
> necessary cooling air to TWO RICH module.
> The system design we have now, with your updated components to sustain
> the large maximum flow capacity of the compressors, seems to me
> correctly dimensioned to our needs and self consistent.
> Why you said in the email below that "This design issue with the RICH
> is the limiting factor for electronics air cooling flow and should be
> analyzed further." ?
> Could you please provide us the drawing of the cooling system with the
> updated components?
>
>
> 2) Nitrogen system
> One RICH module is about 5 m3 and we foresee one refill per day, which
> means about 3.5 l/min.
> To avoid contamination in the RICH from external atmosphere, we want an
> overpressure of 0.5 mbar. Speaking with Sandro, it seems it could be
> further reduced, but, unless strictly required by the system design, I
> would
> not change it for the moment, because we "officially" quoted this
> number few times.
> Inlet and outlet tubes will be on top of the RICH. We don't have
> decided number and size yet, but, given the low gas flow, I don't
> expect any
> particular constraints here. I'm correct?
>
> We discussed about the purity of the nitrogen we are sending inside the
> RICH and you confirmed us that the filters you implemented are ensuring
> what we need.
> From our side, we would like to have also humidity sensors in the
> system, may you add this sensors to your design?
> Why having an interlock shutting down the N2 line in case of problems
> is not required and will have the opposite effects?
> Is the system design we have now able to supply the nitrogen to two
> RICH module or just to one?
>
>
> Best regards and many thanks for your help
> Marco
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 26 May 2016, George Jacobs wrote:
>
>> I will just skip to the chase, so to say. The following RICH design
>> feature will severely limit cooling flow
>> to the enclosed electronics package. FYI, my responses are in blue.
>>
>> --> DSG: The space inside the RICH case is limited:
>> we assume to split the 1 inch tube into few
>> smaller (9-10 mm diameter) plastic tubes for
>> the last part of the line. This may correspond
>> to the ~4m from the patch panel till the electronic
>> panel. Which is the maximum pressure we should
>> aim in this last part of the line ?
>>
>> How many 4 meter long small ID lines have you determined will fit? Do
>> you have drawings showing the required
>> path and connections? I would offer a guess that you will need at
>> least 15 each of the 4 meter long 3/8"
>> (9mm) lines to flow 300 slm cooling flow. How many lines can be fit?
>> Typically, using smaller lines in place
>> of a larger one requires significantly more space than the single
>> large line would. This is due to the space
>> taken up by the tubing wall thickness. At some point, you are
>> basically just filling up the space with nylon.
>>
>>
>> --> DSG: is the current line from tank to RICH
>> suitable for maximum 283 slm (due to the
>> proposed rotameter) ? How complicate is to
>> upgrade it to reach 400 or 600 slm maximum ?
>>
>> Components have been changed to increase flow capacity;
>> 85-850 slm Flow Meter with Manual Valve
>> 0-1000 slm Mass Flow Meter
>>
>> But, in order to increase cooling flow to these higher values,
>> additional numbers of the small ID tubing will
>> be needed. This design feature will limit cooling flow capacity and
>> require higher pressure air at the RICH
>> box interface for the cooling air supply. I recommend we analyze the
>> space available and design some sort of
>> duct to carry the cooling air flow in place of small ID tubing.
>>
>> This design issue with the RICH is the limiting factor for electronics
>> air cooling flow and should be
>> analyzed further.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -- Now, on to the less exciting topics.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Cooling + Interlock
>> --------------------------------------
>> The inlet lines are designed for a typical flux of 100 slm,
>> and a 1 inch size. This flux was tested in a half-size
>> prototype and in a simplified heat load configuration. We
>> would therefore suggest to plan a typical 250 slm with a
>> large safety coefficient (> 50 %).
>>
>> Components have been changed to increase flow capacity;
>> 85-850 slm Flow Meter with Manual Valve
>> 0-1000 slm Mass Flow Meter
>>
>>
>> --> DSG: it would be nice to have the presssure
>> sets of the relief valves and the pressure
>> regulators visible in the interlock sketch,
>> as done for the N2 line.
>>
>> The Pressure System Engineer has not as yet specified this value.
>>
>> --> DSG: should the line from compressor to tank
>> design to sustain the full compressor flux
>> (1200 slm) ?
>>
>> A high pressure 1" line has sufficient capacity to flow > 1200 slm at
>> pressure
>>
>>
>> --> DSG: do we need an interlock for maximum
>> pressure in the tank or in the inlet line or
>> everything is set by the relief valves ?
>> The compressor has its on interlocked limit.
>>
>> I do not follow this.
>>
>> --> DSG: the tank you propose is fine with us.
>>
>> The interlock logic is relative to the cooling circuit
>> functionality. Other anables for the HV and LV power
>> supplies should come from temperature sensors in few
>> relevant places, i.e. inlet, inner volume, exhaust, FTOF.
>>
>> The Cooling Circuit Interlocks will prevent HV and LV operation unless
>> the following are true;
>> 1) At least one compressor is operational
>> 2) Pressure in the air tank is > 80 psi
>> 3) Cooling Air Flow > 100 (TBD)slm to the RICH (TBD = To be
>> determined)
>>
>> --> DSG: may you provide information on your
>> board controlling temperature and humidity
>> sensors ? We usually use SHT75 sensors form
>> sensiron
>> --> INFN: should provide detailed information
>> in the compressor and power supply
>> hardware controls.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Nitrogen line
>> --------------------------------------
>> We plan to refresh the full RICH volume, close to 5000
>> liters, in about one day. The current inlet lines are
>> able to provide a maximum of 7200 l/day, with almost a
>> 50 % safety factor. We consider it a realistic starting
>> point. We would anyway need to minimize the RICH vessel
>> leaks.
>>
>> The LN2 dewar provides a nitrogen with enough purity,
>> with a water content smaller than 0.002%. The filters
>> are just for safety.
>>
>> We will need to monitor temperature + humidity with
>> sensors inside the RICH volume.
>>
>> --> DSG: do we need an interlock logic for the
>> N2 line, i.e. a shutter to isolate the RICH
>> volume in case of problems ?
>>
>> Not required.
>>
>> --> DSG: for example we would be in favor to use
>> humidity sensors to monitor the inlet line
>> quality (the N2 should be fine but we may
>> have leaks or breaks in the line).
>> May we implement those in an cRio interlock
>> logic ?
>>
>> Not required. Isolating the N2 supply would have the opposite effect.
>>
>> --> DSG: do we need a interlock shutting the N2
>> line in case of over-pressure of the RICH
>> module or relief valves would be enough ?
>>
>> Not Required. The bubbler performs that function.
>>
>> --> DSG: The RICH N2 inner volume is supposed to stay
>> at ~0.5-1 mbar higher pressure than atmospheric,
>> to prevent water flowing in. Is the bubble
>> control system sensible enough to prevent
>> over- or under-pressure ?
>>
>> The bubbler will maintain pressure according to the oil fill level and
>> acts as a check valve to prevent back
>> flow. FYI, 1 milibar = 0.4 inches water column.
>>
>> --> DSG: the N2 line starts with a LN2 dewar:
>> do we need dedicated equipement to prevent
>> moinsture along the line and/or injecting
>> low temperature gas inside the RICH ?
>>
>> Not required. The 5,500 liter capacity liquid N2 dewar is located at
>> Bldg 96B, nearly 300 meters from the
>> RICH and utilizes a thermal safety valve that prevents cold gas or
>> cryogenic liquid from flowing into the
>> house N2 supply lines.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------
>>
>> I believe this is very good progress and has improved our
>> understanding of the challenges this detector has
>> for us.
>>
>> However, It is very critical that we optimize the electronics cooling
>> flow path at the RICH patch panel and
>> inside the RICH box. The current design severely limits cooling flow
>> volume..
>>
>> Cheers,
>> George
>>
>> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>> From: "MMarco Contalbrigo" <mcontalb at fe.infn.it>
>> To: "Tyler Lemon" <tlemon at jlab.org>
>> Cc: "rossi patrizia" <rossi at jlab.org>, "clas12 rich"
>> <clas12_rich at jlab.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 1:27:12 PM
>> Subject: [Clas12_rich] May 23th Meeting Minutes
>>
>> Dear all,
>> let me first thanks again the DSG for the essential support they
>> are giving to the project.
>>
>> During May 23th meeting we reviewed various aspects of the RICH
>> preparation. Given the readiness review, we are forced to
>> converge pretty soon on something realistic. The real working
>> considitions will be tested while assembling and may eventually
>> require later adjustments.
>>
>> Below we review the discussed arguments and actions, adding few
>> questions we would like to clarify together with DSG.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Components
>> --------------------------------------
>> Aerogel: forniture will flow on a regular basis. In EEL-121 clean
>> room we plan to
>> - keep logbook of arrivals
>> - store the aerogel inside the dry cabinets
>> - perform visual inspection
>> - weight the tiles to get the density <--> refractive index
>> --> INFN: the scale DSG proposes is fine with us
>> - (maybe) check dimensions with a mold
>> - (maybe) study optical effects with low-power lasers
>> --> INFN: going to supply information on the lasers we
>> are using in Ferrara, to check which kind of safety
>> regulations they would require at JLab
>> We will organize few trips in Washington to measure the
>> aerogel transmission. We assume italian personnel will do
>> the trip.
>> --> DSG: could be available to help in this task ?
>>
>> Spherical Mirrors: 4 mirrors have arrived at Jlab.
>> We are going to open and validate them together with DSG
>> starting the week of 13th of June, while we will be at JLab.
>> We will concentrate in accepting tests, as likely we will not
>> have available all the tools for characterization that week.
>> We plan to
>> - keep logbook
>> - perform visual insepction
>> - perform a pointlike-source spot image measure
>> - (maybe) perform a Shack-Hartmann surface analysis
>> - perform a dimensional check with a CMM machine
>> --> DSG: please check availability of the 60 um CMM
>> machine in the dates 14-17 or 21-22 June.
>>
>> Planar mirror: they are being produced, but will be delivered
>> at JLab only after the summer.
>>
>> Mechanics: an assembling test will be performed in Italy
>> the first half of June. The RICH module + assembling
>> structure will then be transported at JLab. Except for
>> storing, no action is foreseen at JLab before enough space
>> in EEL-124 will become available (i.e. October).
>>
>> Electronics: the JLab FPGA boards should have been produced
>> already. The production of the adapter+Asics boards will
>> start in June. A small quantity will be produced in advance
>> to allow a final check before moving ahead with the massive
>> production (planned in July). In July Matteo Turisini
>> will be at JLab for defining all the procedures and software
>> tools, in collaboration with Ben and DSG, for the electronics
>> acceptance and characterization. The ideal scenario would
>> be DSG will be available to start testing the electronics
>> boards in August. In June Paolo Musico will also visit JLab
>> and work with Ben to the SSP protocol for RICH.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Assembling
>> --------------------------------------
>> We plan to perform the RICH assembling in EEL-124 starting
>> not before October 2016.
>>
>> Mechanics: we will mount the RICH case inside the assembing
>> structure.
>> --> INFN: has to define the bolt size and lift points.
>>
>> Electronics: it can initially be a stand-alone item. With a
>> proper cover of the PMT side, is can run under cosmics and
>> allow for daq, slow control and reconstruction tests. With
>> the back panel in place it will allow for cooling tests.
>> Ideally, we would like to develop/test the same systems we
>> are going to use in the Hall. This means power supplies,
>> cooling system, interlock system, slow control etc...
>> --> INFN: has to discuss with Hall-B management and
>> engineers how to best proceed.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Cooling + Interlock
>> --------------------------------------
>> The inlet lines are designed for a typical flux of 100 slm,
>> and a 1 inch size. This flux was tested in a half-size
>> prototype and in a simplified heat load configuration. We
>> would therefore suggest to plan a typical 250 slm with a
>> large safety coefficient (> 50 %).
>> --> DSG: it would be nice to have the presssure
>> sets of the relief valves and the pressure
>> regulators visible in the interlock sketch,
>> as done for the N2 line.
>> --> DSG: should the line from compressor to tank
>> design to sustain the full compressor flux
>> (1200 slm) ?
>> --> DSG: is the current line from tank to RICH
>> suitable for maximum 283 slm (due to the
>> proposed rotameter) ? How complicate is to
>> upgrade it to reach 400 or 600 slm maximum ?
>> --> DSG: The space inside the RICH case is limited:
>> we assume to split the 1 inch tube into few
>> smaller (9-10 mm diameter) plastic tubes for
>> the last part of the line. This may correspond
>> to the ~4m from the patch panel till the electronic
>> panel. Which is the maximum pressure we should
>> aim in this last part of the line ?
>> --> DSG: do we need an interlock for maximum
>> pressure in the tank or in the inlet line or
>> everything is set by the relief valves ?
>> The compressor has its on interlocked limit.
>> --> DSG: the tank you propose is fine with us.
>>
>> The interlock logic is relative to the cooling circuit
>> functionality. Other anables for the HV and LV power
>> supplies should come from temperature sensors in few
>> relevant places, i.e. inlet, inner volume, exhaust, FTOF.
>> --> DSG: may you provide information on your
>> board controlling temperature and humidity
>> sensors ? We usually use SHT75 sensors form
>> sensiron
>> --> INFN: should provide detailed information
>> in the compressor and power supply
>> hardware controls.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Nitrogen line
>> --------------------------------------
>> We plan to refresh the full RICH volume, close to 5000
>> liters, in about one day. The current inlet lines are
>> able to provide a maximum of 7200 l/day, with almost a
>> 50 % safety factor. We consider it a realistic starting
>> point. We would anyway need to minimize the RICH vessel
>> leaks.
>>
>> The LN2 dewar provides a nitrogen with enough purity,
>> with a water content smaller than 0.002%. The filters
>> are just for safety.
>>
>> We will need to monitor temperature + humidity with
>> sensors inside the RICH volume.
>>
>> --> DSG: do we need an interlock logic for the
>> N2 line, i.e. a shutter to isolate the RICH
>> volume in case of problems ?
>> --> DSG: for example we would be in favor to use
>> humidity sensors to monitor the inlet line
>> quality (the N2 should be fine but we may
>> have leaks or breaks in the line).
>> May we implement those in an cRio interlock
>> logic ?
>> --> DSG: do we need a interlock shutting the N2
>> line in case of over-pressure of the RICH
>> module or relief valves would be enough ?
>> --> DSG: The RICH N2 inner volume is supposed to stay
>> at ~0.5-1 mbar higher pressure than atmospheric,
>> to prevent water flowing in. Is the bubble
>> control system sensible enough to prevent
>> over- or under-pressure ?
>> --> DSG: the N2 line starts with a LN2 dewar:
>> do we need dedicated equipement to prevent
>> moinsture along the line and/or injecting
>> low temperature gas inside the RICH ?
>>
>>
>> Thank you, Marco.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Clas12_rich mailing list
>> Clas12_rich at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_rich
>>
>> -- George Jacobs
>> Physics Detector Support Group
>> Jefferson Lab
>> 12000 Jefferson Ave.
>> STE 12
>> Newport News, VA 23606
>>
>> (office) 757-269-7115
>>
>> (cell) 757-876-0480
>>
>> (email) jacobsg at jlab.org
>>
>> (website) https://userweb.jlab.org/~jacobsg
>>
>>
--
George Jacobs
Jefferson Lab (TJNAF)
STE 12
12000 Jefferson Ave.
Newport News, VA 23606
(office) 757-269-7115
(cell) 757-876-0480
(email) jacobsg at jlab.org
(website) https://userweb.jlab.org/~jacobsg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: RICH-N2-GAScontrols-5-24-2016.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 25295 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_rich/attachments/20160606/f2024230/attachment-0005.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: RICH-N2-valve panel.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 18340 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_rich/attachments/20160606/f2024230/attachment-0006.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: RICH-AirCoolingSetup-5-27-2016.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 36323 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_rich/attachments/20160606/f2024230/attachment-0007.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: RICH-AirCool-ValvePanel.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 22565 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_rich/attachments/20160606/f2024230/attachment-0008.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: RICH_GasSystems.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 106791 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_rich/attachments/20160606/f2024230/attachment-0009.pdf>
More information about the Clas12_rich
mailing list