<html><body><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000"><div>Hello all,<br></div><div><br data-mce-bogus="1"></div><div>The issue mentioned in my previous email with the d0-fit-z0-pdf macro has been resolved. The scan.txt file was not named correctly. After naming it in the correct format, the fit macro was able to be run. The plots of the fit are attached. In the plots, the x-axis is the scale on the CCD mount. This number was added to the distance between the wall and the start of the scale on the CDD mount to get the z measurements below.<br data-mce-bogus="1"></div><div><br data-mce-bogus="1"></div><div>Mirror 1<br data-mce-bogus="1"></div><div> d0 = 1.891 mm<br></div><div> z = 2725.796 mm<br></div><div><br data-mce-bogus="1"></div><div>Mirror 3<br data-mce-bogus="1"></div><div> d0 = 1.700 mm<br></div><div> z = 2725.013 mm<br></div><div><br data-mce-bogus="1"></div><div>These fit-d0 values are greater than the minimum observed-d0 values. Is this to be expected because how the macro fits the data?</div><div><br data-mce-bogus="1"></div><div>Best regards,<br data-mce-bogus="1"></div><div>Tyler<br data-mce-bogus="1"></div><hr id="zwchr" data-marker="__DIVIDER__"></div></body></html>