[Clas12_software] ready for new release
Raffaella De Vita
devita at jlab.org
Sun Jul 1 16:28:37 EDT 2018
Hi Francois,
it would not be necessary for changes to the output banks but I will be
to get Cole's updates. So in conclusion I also would say yes.
Regards,
Raffaella
L Smith wrote:
> I would say yes, to pick up 4 cable swaps in Pcal and EC that I found.
> Cole
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jul 1, 2018, at 4:21 PM, Francois-Xavier Girod <fxgirod at jlab.org
> <mailto:fxgirod at jlab.org>> wrote:
>
>> Dear Raffaella, all
>>
>> Can you please confirm that we should redecode first?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Best regards
>> FX
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018, 05:12 Raffaella De Vita <devita at jlab.org
>> <mailto:devita at jlab.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Latifa,
>> the cooking of run 4013 and 4150 was mostly meant to further
>> validate
>> the new tag and check the effect of the changes (code/geometry) on
>> detector calibrations. However, low energy data would certainly give
>> better sensitivity to the geometry changes as you mentioned. New T0
>> calibrations for those runs runs will be needed, though, because
>> using
>> the event stat time in TBT impacts the T0 in dc calibrations.
>> These were
>> derived from run 4130 by Latif but would not necessarily apply to
>> the
>> 2.2 GeV data that were recorded long before, because of changes
>> in the
>> TDC readout windows that were done in between.
>> What I would suggest is to compile a list of all the runs that
>> you would
>> like to have cooked both for specific studies and for data
>> analysis and
>> start the pass0 as soon as possible to check which runs will need
>> to be
>> re-calibrated.
>> Best regards,
>> Raffaella
>>
>>
>> Latifa Elouadrhiri wrote:
>> > Dear Raffaella,
>> >
>> > It would be good to add to the list of data processing few
>> files from
>> > of the 2.2 GeV run also, since we can judge immediately with the
>> > position and resolution of the elastic peak. This should get
>> better
>> > with all the changes in particular the geometry.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> > Latifa
>> >
>> >
>> > On 7/1/18 3:35 PM, Raffaella Devita wrote:
>> >> Dear FX and Will,
>> >> all the changes we wanted to have in the new release have been
>> merged
>> >> to the development branch. Can you create a new tag?
>> >> Since there are major changes, the tag id should be 5b.5.0. It
>> would
>> >> be good to have a full list of the commits in the release
>> note; also
>> >> this will be compatible with gemc 4a.2.4.
>> >> There will be probably a few more updates, beyond what was
>> planned,
>> >> in the next days from EB development and the swimming API but
>> the tag
>> >> can be already used for cooking since some validation on MC
>> and real
>> >> data has already been performed.
>> >> In particular it would be good to recook run 4013 and 4150. In
>> this
>> >> cooking, it would be useful to test the new region2 corrected
>> >> geometry: to do that, the yaml file should be modified to use the
>> >> service options indicated below.
>> >> Best regards,
>> >> Raffaella
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ...
>> >> services:
>> >> DCHB:
>> >> torusMap: Symm_torus_r2501_phi16_z251_24Apr2018.dat
>> >> solenoidMap: Symm_solenoid_r601_phi1_z1201_2008.dat
>> >> useStartTime: "true"
>> >> geomDBVariation: may_2018_engineers
>> >> constantsDBVariation: calib
>> >> DCTB:
>> >> geomDBVariation: may_2018_engineers
>> >> constantsDBVariation: calib
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Clas12_software mailing list
>> Clas12_software at jlab.org <mailto:Clas12_software at jlab.org>
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_software
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_software/attachments/20180701/7f193a15/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Clas12_software
mailing list